I created a Jira https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5141
Jacques From: "Adrian Crum" <adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com> > That would be a good idea. I didn't remove it because I don't have time > to do an impact analysis. > > -Adrian > > On 2/24/2013 9:00 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >> Hi Adrian, >> >> Then should we not remove it? >> >> Jacques >> >> From: <adri...@apache.org> >>> Author: adrianc >>> Date: Sun Feb 24 00:29:25 2013 >>> New Revision: 1449430 >>> >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1449430 >>> Log: >>> FIXME comment. No functional change. >>> >>> Modified: >>> ofbiz/trunk/applications/party/entitydef/entitymodel.xml >>> >>> Modified: ofbiz/trunk/applications/party/entitydef/entitymodel.xml >>> URL: >>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/applications/party/entitydef/entitymodel.xml?rev=1449430&r1=1449429&r2=1449430&view=diff >>> ============================================================================== >>> --- ofbiz/trunk/applications/party/entitydef/entitymodel.xml (original) >>> +++ ofbiz/trunk/applications/party/entitydef/entitymodel.xml Sun Feb 24 >>> 00:29:25 2013 >>> @@ -2506,6 +2506,8 @@ under the License. >>> <view-link entity-alias="PTY" rel-entity-alias="PTYGRP" >>> rel-optional="true"> >>> <key-map field-name="partyId"/> >>> </view-link> >>> + <!-- FIXME: This relationship does not make sense. There is no >>> one-to-one relationship from PARTY to PARTY STATUS, >>> + so this relation will cause duplicate values for parties with >>> multiple statuses. --> >>> <view-link entity-alias="PTY" rel-entity-alias="PS" >>> rel-optional="true"> >>> <key-map field-name="partyId"/> >>> </view-link> >>> >>> >
