I don't see a big risk at backporting those. Moreover Lucene changes includes fixes
+1 Jacques Pierre Smits wrote: > +1 > > I agree. The release is not available yet to the general public and such > improvement are important enough to incorporate now (in stead of waiting > for the next opportune moment) and ease the future work. > > Pierre Smits > > *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* > Services & Solutions for Cloud- > Based Manufacturing, Professional > Services and Retail & Trade > http://www.orrtiz.com > > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Adrian Crum < > adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com> wrote: > >> Generally speaking, I am in favor of backporting recent refactorings to >> the most recent branch - mainly because it makes it easier to keep the >> branch updated. >> >> Adrian Crum >> Sandglass Software >> www.sandglass-software.com >> >> >> On 9/13/2013 12:07 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I would like to backport to the new 13.07 branch some changes recently >>> committed to the trunk (that are not bug fixes): >>> >>> a) Revisions: 1518925 (and the related minor 1519999, 1520319, 1520321, >>> 1520326, 1520509) Moved Lucene dependent code out of applications >>> b) Revision 1520510, 1520744: Simplified the layout of the >>> main/framework/applications/**specialpurpose build files >>> >>> Main reasons for #a: >>> * if we backport, the users of 13.07, if interested in Lucene features, >>> will have an easy way to deploy the specialpurpose/lucene app without >>> conflicts with code embedded in applications >>> * in the trunk, the lucene code in specialpurpose has been upgraded to >>> the latest release that includes bug fixes over the version currently used >>> in 13.07 >>> >>> Main reasons for #b: >>> * the build files 13.07 have been modified in the branch in order to >>> support the fact that in the branch we don't have most of the >>> specialpurpose components; if we sync them with the simplified build files >>> (without redundant targets) that are now in trunk it will be easier to >>> maintain them in the branch when further changes will need to be backported >>> >>> Any objections? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Jacopo