I don't see a big risk at backporting those. Moreover Lucene changes includes 
fixes

 +1

Jacques

Pierre Smits wrote:
> +1
> 
> I agree. The release is not available yet to the general public and such
> improvement are important enough to incorporate now (in stead of waiting
> for the next opportune moment) and ease the future work.
> 
> Pierre Smits
> 
> *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
> Services & Solutions for Cloud-
> Based Manufacturing, Professional
> Services and Retail & Trade
> http://www.orrtiz.com
> 
> 
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Adrian Crum <
> adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com> wrote:
> 
>> Generally speaking, I am in favor of backporting recent refactorings to
>> the most recent branch - mainly because it makes it easier to keep the
>> branch updated.
>> 
>> Adrian Crum
>> Sandglass Software
>> www.sandglass-software.com
>> 
>> 
>> On 9/13/2013 12:07 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> I would like to backport to the new 13.07 branch some changes recently
>>> committed to the trunk (that are not bug fixes):
>>> 
>>> a) Revisions: 1518925 (and the related minor 1519999, 1520319, 1520321,
>>> 1520326, 1520509) Moved Lucene dependent code out of applications
>>> b) Revision 1520510, 1520744: Simplified the layout of the
>>> main/framework/applications/**specialpurpose build files
>>> 
>>> Main reasons for #a:
>>> * if we backport, the users of 13.07, if interested in Lucene features,
>>> will have an easy way to deploy the specialpurpose/lucene app without
>>> conflicts with code embedded in applications
>>> * in the trunk, the lucene code in specialpurpose has been upgraded to
>>> the latest release that includes bug fixes over the version currently used
>>> in 13.07
>>> 
>>> Main reasons for #b:
>>> * the build files 13.07 have been modified in the branch in order to
>>> support the fact that in the branch we don't have most of the
>>> specialpurpose components; if we sync them with the simplified build files
>>> (without redundant targets) that are now in trunk it will be easier to
>>> maintain them in the branch when further changes will need to be backported
>>> 
>>> Any objections?
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> Jacopo

Reply via email to