[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13878284#comment-13878284
 ] 

Christian Carlow commented on OFBIZ-5420:
-----------------------------------------

In my second to last post I asked if BOM items should not ever exist as virtual 
products but have since found that the BOM Simulation app includes a virtual 
column to indicate if any of the BOM is virtual.  This seems to suggest that 
BOMs should be able to exist as virtual products and if so there still exists 
the problem of BOM variant selections not being supported.

Pierre your mention of BOM costs seems to be the correct way to calculate the 
assembled product price.  I guess instead of entering individual prices for 
each assembly component to make up the total unit price of the final assembled 
product, the users would instead need to run the BOM Simulation for the 
assembled product and add up the BOM costs to determine the unit price which 
would be used to override the auto-assigned order item default price?  If this 
is the case then one improvement that could save users time would be to add a 
total line at the end of the BOM Simulation screen to provide the users with 
the total without having to manually calculate it.



> Add ability to separately price BOM elements for orders
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OFBIZ-5420
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5420
>             Project: OFBiz
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: SVN trunk
>            Reporter: Christian Carlow
>         Attachments: OFBIZ-5420-1.patch, OFBIZ-5420-2.patch, OFBIZ-5420.patch
>
>
> I have a scenario where a company individually prices BOM elements of 
> assembled products ordered.  So if an item is manufactured from 2 component 
> products, the company needs to be able to specify prices for both of the 
> components to made up the total parent product cost.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)

Reply via email to