sure, I will. Thanks,
Jacopo On Jun 23, 2014, at 4:42 PM, Dékány Dániel <ddek...@freemail.hu> wrote: > That's fine as far as I'm concerned. (Update from GitHub and rebuild > if that's not a problem.) Thanks, Daniel Dekany > Jacopo Cappellato <jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com> írta: >> I can actually commit the new jar and the updated code to run it in the >> trunk in order to simplify the tests from the community. WDYT? >> >> Jacopo >> >> On Jun 23, 2014, at 2:18 PM, Dékány Dániel <ddek...@freemail.hu> wrote: >> >>> It would be good if testing the new version goes beyond that single test >>> case, however. Alhough the reworked method overloading support has good >>> test coverage, this was a quite complex change (it doesn't just fix the >>> null issue, but many others, like rounding issues). Not to mention that >>> turing on the new overloaded method handling is inherently not 100% >>> backward compatible (that's why it's by default off). Although its >>> much less prone to fail with errors, there's still a little chance that >>> you need to addjust some OfBiz code. Thanks, Daniel Dekany >>> Jacques Le Roux <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> írta: >>>> Good news, thanks Jacopo! >>>> >>>> Jacques >>>> >>>> Le 23/06/2014 12:43, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : >>>>> FYI: >>>>> >>>>> I have been working with Daniel on this and he has helped a lot and I >>>>> have now a working environment; as soon as the new version will be >>>>> published I will update the OFBiz code accordingly. >>>>> >>>>> Jacopo >>>>> >>>>> On Jun 18, 2014, at 11:11 AM, Jacopo Cappellato >>>>> <jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I did the tests but unfortunately they were still not successful. >>>>>> I have posted a comment to the ticket: let's see what Daniel has to >>>>>> say. >>>>>> >>>>>> Jacopo >>>>>> >>>>>> On Jun 17, 2014, at 10:13 AM, Jacques Le Roux >>>>>> <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We need to address this >>>>>>> https://sourceforge.net/p/freemarker/bugs/363/?page=2 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>> PS: @Adam, I put you to be sure you will get a chance to read ;) >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>
