This is now committed to the trunk with rev. 1605029 Jacopo
On Jun 23, 2014, at 5:20 PM, Jacopo Cappellato <[email protected]> wrote: > sure, I will. > > Thanks, > > Jacopo > > On Jun 23, 2014, at 4:42 PM, Dékány Dániel <[email protected]> wrote: > >> That's fine as far as I'm concerned. (Update from GitHub and rebuild >> if that's not a problem.) Thanks, Daniel Dekany >> Jacopo Cappellato <[email protected]> írta: >>> I can actually commit the new jar and the updated code to run it in the >>> trunk in order to simplify the tests from the community. WDYT? >>> >>> Jacopo >>> >>> On Jun 23, 2014, at 2:18 PM, Dékány Dániel <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> It would be good if testing the new version goes beyond that single test >>>> case, however. Alhough the reworked method overloading support has good >>>> test coverage, this was a quite complex change (it doesn't just fix >>>> the null issue, but many others, like rounding issues). Not to mention >>>> that turing on the new overloaded method handling is inherently not 100% >>>> backward compatible (that's why it's by default off). Although its >>>> much less prone to fail with errors, there's still a little chance >>>> that you need to addjust some OfBiz code. Thanks, Daniel Dekany >>>> Jacques Le Roux <[email protected]> írta: >>>>> Good news, thanks Jacopo! >>>>> >>>>> Jacques >>>>> >>>>> Le 23/06/2014 12:43, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : >>>>>> FYI: >>>>>> >>>>>> I have been working with Daniel on this and he has helped a lot and I >>>>>> have now a working environment; as soon as the new version will be >>>>>> published I will update the OFBiz code accordingly. >>>>>> >>>>>> Jacopo >>>>>> >>>>>> On Jun 18, 2014, at 11:11 AM, Jacopo Cappellato >>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I did the tests but unfortunately they were still not successful. >>>>>>> I have posted a comment to the ticket: let's see what Daniel has to >>>>>>> say. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jacopo >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Jun 17, 2014, at 10:13 AM, Jacques Le Roux >>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We need to address this >>>>>>>> https://sourceforge.net/p/freemarker/bugs/363/?page=2 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>>> PS: @Adam, I put you to be sure you will get a chance to read ;) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>> >
