Those pages are in the last category - they are interesting ideas that
never happened but are worth keeping on-line.
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
On 1/10/2015 12:03 PM, Ron Wheeler wrote:
If someone who knows the software could go through and delete the stuff
that never happened and changed the future tense to the present tense
for things that are part of OFBiz, we can move forward.
If the "essential" bits would be better in another part of the wiki,
either move it or let us know that it should be moved and suggest some
possible places where it would be more helpful.
The fundamental problem with the wiki is that it is not correct.
We can play with the structure and the organization but the highest
priority is to get rid of incorrect and misleading information.
If there are pages that contain some interesting ideas that never
happened but are worth keeping on-line, we should copy them to some sort
of "project history" section where it is clear to new users that these
musings may have value but are not useful in understanding OFBiz as
shipped today.
Ron
On 10/01/2015 1:20 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Le 10/01/2015 18:18, Adrian Crum a écrit :
I don't see how that page is related to Moqui or Hemp. I remember
David trying to rally support for a set of design documents -
something OFBiz desperately needs.
For instance https://github.com/jonesde/HiveMind and
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBREQDES/Project+Management+Concept+Design
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBREQDES/OFBiz+EZBiz will
never exist, Moqui replaced it
For other pages it's more links to Oasis and alike, I have not seen
much interest around the oagis speciapurpose component!
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBREQDES/Universal+Business+Process+Library+Index
is certainly the most interesting part
Yes, they are neglected. But from my perspective, they are essential.
Then why are they neglected?
Jacques
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
On 1/10/2015 5:44 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
I even wonder if we should not get rid of the OFBREQDES workpspace all
together
Since then David has created Moqui and Hemp. It seems to me that people
interested should rather refer to them than this now deprecated
workspace.
Jacques
Le 07/01/2015 22:53, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
I think we can remove this page
Jacques
Le 26/11/2014 15:12, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBREQDES/Open+Standards+for+OFBiz
This page appears to be old and probably in need of update.
Some of the sentences using the future tense should be changed to say
that the work proposed has been done.
It does provide an important information about the fundamental
philosophy of OFBiz.
The whole OFBiz Requirements and Designs
<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBREQDES> space seems
to be neglected.
I am not sure that this Confluence space is currently being used and
perhaps the material that is still relevant could be moved to a
better place.
Some seems to belong in the end-user doc (the page referenced above
Open Standards for OFBiz
<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBREQDES/Open+Standards+for+OFBiz>
seems to fit that as does the whole section Universal Business
Process Library Index
<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBREQDES/Universal+Business+Process+Library+Index>)
Some seems to be technical docs.
I am not sure how much is useful for understanding current technical
state but perhaps some of the more knowledgeable members could sort
some of this out.
