I have committed at r1660392

Jacques

Le 12/02/2015 21:56, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Yes, but why not Petabyte?

Jacques

Le 12/02/2015 19:39, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
Patch suggestion for your consideration


Index: framework/common/data/UnitData.xml
===================================================================
--- framework/common/data/UnitData.xml    (revision 1659295)
+++ framework/common/data/UnitData.xml    (working copy)
@@ -30,7 +30,8 @@
     <Uom abbreviation="Mb" description="Megabit of Data" uomId="DATA_Mb" 
uomTypeId="DATA_MEASURE"/>
     <Uom abbreviation="Gb" description="Gigabit of Data" uomId="DATA_Gb" 
uomTypeId="DATA_MEASURE"/>
     <Uom abbreviation="Tb" description="Terabit of Data" uomId="DATA_Tb" 
uomTypeId="DATA_MEASURE"/>
-
+    <Uom abbreviation="Pb" description="Petabit of Data" uomId="DATA_Pb" 
uomTypeId="DATA_MEASURE"/>
+
     <Uom abbreviation="B" description="Byte of Data" uomId="DATA_B" 
uomTypeId="DATA_MEASURE"/>
     <Uom abbreviation="KB" description="Kilobyte of Data" uomId="DATA_KB" 
uomTypeId="DATA_MEASURE"/>
     <Uom abbreviation="MB" description="Megabyte of Data" uomId="DATA_MB" 
uomTypeId="DATA_MEASURE"/>
@@ -42,6 +43,7 @@
     <UomConversion uomId="DATA_Mb" uomIdTo="DATA_Kb" conversionFactor="1024"/>
     <UomConversion uomId="DATA_Gb" uomIdTo="DATA_Mb" conversionFactor="1024"/>
     <UomConversion uomId="DATA_Tb" uomIdTo="DATA_Gb" conversionFactor="1024"/>
+    <UomConversion uomId="DATA_Pb" uomIdTo="DATA_Tb" conversionFactor="1024"/>

     <UomConversion uomId="DATA_B" uomIdTo="DATA_b" conversionFactor="8"/>
     <UomConversion uomId="DATA_KB" uomIdTo="DATA_B" conversionFactor="1024"/>


Reply via email to