It was already there.
Ron
On 17/02/2015 9:38 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
I have committed at r1660392
Jacques
Le 12/02/2015 21:56, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Yes, but why not Petabyte?
Jacques
Le 12/02/2015 19:39, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
Patch suggestion for your consideration
Index: framework/common/data/UnitData.xml
===================================================================
--- framework/common/data/UnitData.xml (revision 1659295)
+++ framework/common/data/UnitData.xml (working copy)
@@ -30,7 +30,8 @@
<Uom abbreviation="Mb" description="Megabit of Data"
uomId="DATA_Mb" uomTypeId="DATA_MEASURE"/>
<Uom abbreviation="Gb" description="Gigabit of Data"
uomId="DATA_Gb" uomTypeId="DATA_MEASURE"/>
<Uom abbreviation="Tb" description="Terabit of Data"
uomId="DATA_Tb" uomTypeId="DATA_MEASURE"/>
-
+ <Uom abbreviation="Pb" description="Petabit of Data"
uomId="DATA_Pb" uomTypeId="DATA_MEASURE"/>
+
<Uom abbreviation="B" description="Byte of Data" uomId="DATA_B"
uomTypeId="DATA_MEASURE"/>
<Uom abbreviation="KB" description="Kilobyte of Data"
uomId="DATA_KB" uomTypeId="DATA_MEASURE"/>
<Uom abbreviation="MB" description="Megabyte of Data"
uomId="DATA_MB" uomTypeId="DATA_MEASURE"/>
@@ -42,6 +43,7 @@
<UomConversion uomId="DATA_Mb" uomIdTo="DATA_Kb"
conversionFactor="1024"/>
<UomConversion uomId="DATA_Gb" uomIdTo="DATA_Mb"
conversionFactor="1024"/>
<UomConversion uomId="DATA_Tb" uomIdTo="DATA_Gb"
conversionFactor="1024"/>
+ <UomConversion uomId="DATA_Pb" uomIdTo="DATA_Tb"
conversionFactor="1024"/>
<UomConversion uomId="DATA_B" uomIdTo="DATA_b"
conversionFactor="8"/>
<UomConversion uomId="DATA_KB" uomIdTo="DATA_B"
conversionFactor="1024"/>
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
