[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14326179#comment-14326179 ]
Adrian Crum commented on OFBIZ-5569: ------------------------------------ Maybe I wasn't clear, so I will draw a picture: {code} InventoryItemDetail | |__WorkEffort (Create Widget) | |__ WorkEffort (Assemble Widget) | | | |__ Party (Assembler) | |__ WorkEffort (Inspect Assembly) | | | |__ Party (Inspector) | |__ WorkEffort (Rework part) | | | |__ Party (Assembler) | |__ WorkEffort (Inspect Assembly) | | | |__ Party (Inspector) | . . . {code} > Add production run task inspection capabilities using time entry improvements > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: OFBIZ-5569 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5569 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: manufacturing > Affects Versions: Trunk > Reporter: Christian Carlow > Assignee: Pierre Smits > > There doesn't seem to be a standard method for handling production run > inspections that offer any real power in terms of reporting. The system > already lacks time entry functionality which will be added in OFBIZ-5532. > Once time entry functionality is added to the declaration services, > TimeEntryAssoc could be created to link an inspection time entries to a > manufacturing work time entries to represent an inspection of manufacturing > work. The goal is to be able to determine the number of bad pieces produced > per manufacturing worker and who was the inspector. The functionality should > also be flexible and powerful enough to distinguish who is actually at fault > for the bad piece. In most cases, the manufacturing workers will be at > fault, but there could be times where an inspector might accidentally drop a > good or potentially good piece and the system should be able to flag them as > the party actually responsible for the defect. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)