[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14326066#comment-14326066
]
Pierre Smits commented on OFBIZ-5569:
-------------------------------------
I wonder whether the partyId in the InventoryItem was intended that way. The
DMRB isn't very specific on the matter.
And I see a similarity with OFBIZ-5704.
> Add production run task inspection capabilities using time entry improvements
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OFBIZ-5569
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5569
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: manufacturing
> Affects Versions: Trunk
> Reporter: Christian Carlow
> Assignee: Pierre Smits
>
> There doesn't seem to be a standard method for handling production run
> inspections that offer any real power in terms of reporting. The system
> already lacks time entry functionality which will be added in OFBIZ-5532.
> Once time entry functionality is added to the declaration services,
> TimeEntryAssoc could be created to link an inspection time entries to a
> manufacturing work time entries to represent an inspection of manufacturing
> work. The goal is to be able to determine the number of bad pieces produced
> per manufacturing worker and who was the inspector. The functionality should
> also be flexible and powerful enough to distinguish who is actually at fault
> for the bad piece. In most cases, the manufacturing workers will be at
> fault, but there could be times where an inspector might accidentally drop a
> good or potentially good piece and the system should be able to flag them as
> the party actually responsible for the defect.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
