When talking about the 'same component' I meant everything in the same
folder structure, as in:

component
|-> /widget
|->/ widget/forms
|-> /scripts
|-> etc

Anything outside that structure is - with current definitions - outside the
component. Think of a screen of component A referencing a script in another
component B. For such the 'full' location should/must be referenced, as it
is now.

If a screen AScreenName - existing in AScreens.xml in component A - needs
to be referenced in another screens.xml file in the component A (say in
BScreens.xml), it should suffice to have an 'short' location reference. As
in <screen name="AScreenName" location="AScreens.xml" />

Best regards,

Pierre Smits

*ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
Services & Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail & Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com

On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Adrian Crum <
adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com> wrote:

> I don't think this will work - for a number of reasons.
>
> Using the screen widgets as an example, what does "widgets in the same
> component" mean? Widgets are reused everywhere. If a component reuses a
> widget in another component, what is "the same component?" The component
> referencing the reused widget, or the component that contains the reused
> widget?
>
> Adrian Crum
> Sandglass Software
> www.sandglass-software.com
>
> On 4/29/2015 11:02 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
>
>> Currently many widgets are referenced in other widgets (e.g. forms, etc)
>> by
>> incorporating the location to the widget.
>>
>> e.g. In a screen file following the following can occur:
>>
>>     - <include-form name="form1"
>>     location="component://componentName/widget/forms/Forms.xml"/>
>>     - <include-screen name="Screen1"
>>     location="component://componentName/widget/AnotherScreens.xml"/>
>>     - <include-menu name="Menu1"
>>     location="component://componentName/widget/Menus.xml'/>
>>     - <script
>> location="component://componentName/scripts/script.groovy"/>
>>
>> And in controller.xml:
>>
>>     - <view-map name="optionsetting" type="screen" page=
>>     "component://order/widget/OrderEntryOrderScreens.xml#OptionSettings"/>
>>     - <event type="simple" path=
>>     "component://commonext/script/org/ofbiz/setup/SetupEvents.xml" invoke=
>>     "createProductStoreWithDefaultSetting"/>
>>
>> And in the ofbiz-component.xml file of the component:
>>
>>
>>     - <entity-resource type="model" reader-name="main" loader="main"
>> location
>>     ="entitydef/entitymodel.xml"/>
>>     - <entity-resource type="eca" reader-name="main" loader="main"
>> location=
>>     "entitydef/eecas.xml"/>
>>     - <entity-resource type="data" reader-name="seed" loader="main"
>> location=
>>     "data/WorkEffortTypeData.xml"/>
>>
>>
>>
>> However, having to type the location path everywhere is quite tedious and
>> error prone.
>>
>> Couldn't it be possible to add a layer of flexibility, so that widgets in
>> the same component can be referenced in an easier way? Like for screens:
>>
>>     - <include-form name="form1" location="Forms.xml"/>
>>     - <include-screen name="Screen1" location="AnotherScreens.xml"/>
>>     - <include-menu name="Menu1" location="Menus.xml'/>
>>     - <script  location="script.groovy"/>
>>
>> And for controller.xml:
>>
>>     - <event type="simple" path="SetupEvents.xml" invoke=
>>     "createProductStoreWithDefaultSetting"/>
>>     - <view-map name="optionsetting" type="screen" page=
>>     "OrderEntryOrderScreens.xml#OptionSettings"/>
>>
>> And for ofbiz-component.xml:
>>
>>
>>     - <entity-resource type="model" reader-name="main" loader="main"
>> location
>>     =entitymodel.xml"/>
>>     - <entity-resource type="eca" reader-name="main" loader="main"
>> location=
>>     "eecas.xml"/>
>>     - <entity-resource type="data" reader-name="seed" loader="main"
>> location=
>>     "WorkEffortTypeData.xml"/>
>>
>>
>> Of course, such would require that the default paths to the various widget
>> locations must be known on the moment of loading the component (especially
>> the entitymodel and ecas/secas - I migt be forgetting some).
>> This could be done by references in a record in the SystemProperty entity,
>> and as a fallback the system.properties file in the component.
>>
>> Such an improvement would, I believe, make both development of new
>> applications and migration regarding future framework changes easier.
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>>
>> Pierre Smits
>>
>> *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
>> Services & Solutions for Cloud-
>> Based Manufacturing, Professional
>> Services and Retail & Trade
>> http://www.orrtiz.com
>>
>>

Reply via email to