Hi Ron and Jacques, Interesting read on the conventions Ron, thank you for sharing. If I may throw in my 2 cents, I think both getters and setters are one of the worst things to happen in the Java world and people seem to be completely brainwashed by it. We should probably limit their use to frameworks that force us to have them, not more.
Here are some references as to why we should avoid getters and setters: http://www.martinfowler.com/bliki/AnemicDomainModel.html https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anemic_domain_model http://www.javaworld.com/article/2072302/core-java/more-on-getters-and-setters.html http://www.javaworld.com/article/2073723/core-java/why-getter-and-setter-methods-are-evil.html Taher Alkhateeb ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jacques Le Roux" <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 8 July, 2015 10:22:48 AM Subject: Re: Coding standards I guess you know we already have https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBADMIN/Coding+Conventions "Use descriptive conditions" and "Meaningful aliases" are interesting and we could indeed add 2 lines about that in the page above (just after the link to the old Sun conventions) I don't agree with their "Use multi-line ternary operator" rule but I don't want to engage in a discussion about this nor all other cases. Setters existed long ago Spring went to life ;) Jacques Le 08/07/2015 05:34, Ron Wheeler a écrit : > https://github.com/adaptlearning/documentation/blob/master/01_cross_workstream/style_guide.md > > is a guide for coding of Adapt - Open Source course delivery tool . > > I am not sure that I agree with all of the rules. > Some are much better than the ones that I would choose but perhaps I am just > too lazy to do the extra work to make my code easier to read. > > They seem to think that computers have more time to parse code than people do > to ponder obscurity and seem to feel that the addition of extra lines > of code to make the code clearer is worth the extra 1/1000 of a nanosecond > that it costs. > "Use descriptive conditions" is an example of a frivolous waste of valuable > computer time just to save people having to think. > "Meaningful aliases" is another example of adding a line of code just to make > the code easier for humans. > > If you are not offended by the waste of computer resources at compile time, > you might consider adapting some of these rules to OFBiz java. > > I am not sure that they their "Don't use setters" instructions will help the > DI or IoC crowd but they are JavaScript devotees who apparently do not > follow the Spring model. > > Ron >
