[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6647?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14902185#comment-14902185
]
Michael Brohl commented on OFBIZ-6647:
--------------------------------------
[[email protected]],
thank you for the useful information. Seems we don't have an issue, if I
understand you right?
> Refactoring to consolidate different Calendar implementations
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6647
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6647
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: Upcoming Branch
> Reporter: Michael Brohl
> Assignee: Michael Brohl
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Upcoming Branch
>
>
> This came up in reference to
> [6594|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6594]:
> Piere Smits: "Currently we are using 'import com.ibm.icu.util.Calendar' at
> various places. But we're also using 'java.util.Calendar' at other places.
> Better is it to make a choice for consistency."
> We should fisrt analyze the usage of different implementations and the impact
> of replacing one with the other (e.g. what's the difference of these
> implementations).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
