[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6647?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14902531#comment-14902531 ]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-6647: ---------------------------------------- Pierre's wish would be to use only one, we definitively picked IBM's but Oracle's stayed in some places (or was added later). I guess w/o a contribution this situation will continue... > Refactoring to consolidate different Calendar implementations > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: OFBIZ-6647 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6647 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: Upcoming Branch > Reporter: Michael Brohl > Assignee: Michael Brohl > Priority: Minor > Fix For: Upcoming Branch > > > This came up in reference to > [6594|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6594]: > Piere Smits: "Currently we are using 'import com.ibm.icu.util.Calendar' at > various places. But we're also using 'java.util.Calendar' at other places. > Better is it to make a choice for consistency." > We should fisrt analyze the usage of different implementations and the impact > of replacing one with the other (e.g. what's the difference of these > implementations). -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)