[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15242458#comment-15242458
]
Swapnil Shah edited comment on OFBIZ-6964 at 4/15/16 5:29 AM:
--------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks for the detailed feedback and other references. Few thoughts
{quote}
We got to make a start on the concept of replenishment and that's what this is
with the idea of KISS. Let's not confuse the "metaphor" with its dictionary
meaning. We are seeking a metpahor for the sake of implementing a
functionality. At the same time the need is to differentiate it from the
concept of requirements - Product Requirement resulting in purchase orders or
Internal Requirement used mostly for parts/raw material movement for
manufacturing/assembling. Hence, I strongly feel that the word "replenishment"
with the current definition in this context seems apt and enough.
{quote}
I might not have made myself very clear but intention was never to
theoretically or metahorically belabor around the Replenishment concept.
Instead idea is to explore the most commonly used Replenishment "*Policies*"
followed in retail domain across industries that have physical stores spread
across geographically. It could have possibly helped in coming up more holistic
design and solution that could be more widely acceptable (even if we start with
piece-meal apprach or KISS as per your liking).
{quote}
Let's dissect the 'various ways' and see what else can we address in this story
-
i. via inter-store transfers - I would rather have inter-facility transfers to
be specific. We need to understand the difference between inter-store transfer
and inter-facility transfer. What we are actually aiming for in this story is
inter-facility transfer. A store or stores is/are just a front-end for one or
more facilities.
{quote}
Thanks for dissecting it further and Yes, surely we can refer it as
inter-facility transfer. I earlier specified it as inter-store because
requirement would be essentially driven based on Pull from store front for a
given item rather than Push from any associted or backup facility.
{quote}
ii. via local vendors directly - Is already handled via product requirements,
purchase orders and incoming shipments, etc. This is widely referred in OFBiz
as purchase requirements. Hence this no longer needs to be handled.
iii. via drop shipments from vendor's own distribution centers (VMI) etc. - Is
also handled via purchase orders and related process, differing just in the
absence of an incoming shipment. And I would not call it as replenishment in
any way, it is direct order fulfilment or any other terminology.
{quote}
Yes, while its true that in Ofbiz parlance they are kind of purchase
requirement but culminatoin of these process flows in PO generation is not
always necessarily true. On numerous occassions we have seen scenarios where
Store at best can suggest How much & When product need to be replenished based
on sales velocity & forecasted demand to venodrs but they are not necessarily
transformed into purchase orders per se. It is purely vendor's prerogative. In
other words such replenishments works more on *Push* based mechanism from
Vendor and not necessarily driven through PO. So in short YES, for now we can
keep it out from the scope of handling Inter-facility transfer flow but they
should be still considerered for any standard requirement generation flow.
Coming back to the concept of requirement, The Product Requirement resulting
into purchase order and Iternal Requirement into production order is a typical
OFbiz workflow historically and in that sense i agree that auto-refilling of
the store via inter-store(facility) "Stock Transfer" is a new workflow or
possibly an extension of the existing MRP flow.
Based on all these understanding i believe, the core business requirement is
still to have the system to suggest the Requirements in terms of Qty and Timing
based on certain pre-defined set of rules replenishment policies. Subsequently
there might be different ways to further process these requirements like, via
Purchase or Production Orders (based on existing Ofbiz support) or via
Inter-Facility Transfer (by introducing new systemic mechanism to support it)
Also based on the shared Opentaps data, it seems they are using all the exact
same existing set of MrpEventTypeIds for defining InventoryEventPlannedType
along with new needed ones. I am not too sure from architeture and implemention
point of view which could be simpler route to follow. But similar new types
could be added to MrpEventType as well to achieve the desired results by
leveraging upon most of the existing MRP algorithm (and UI support), of course
with needed extension for supporting new modes of processing product
requirements via Transfers. Something like as follows:
Let's say a typical Retail store supply chain setup looks like (as presented in
flow diagram).
!screenshot-1.png|width=800px!
Introduce new ProductFacilityAssoc,FacilityAssocType, MrpEventType and
corresponding RequirementType to serve the requirement for replenishing the
store's via Inter-facility transfers mode. We could extend the MRP logic to
honor these new types and create corresponding event & requirement for Stock
transfer. The data model & UI could be extended as follows:
{code}
<!-- New Entity ProductFacilityAssoc (Product-wise associations between
facilities to define from what all facilities a given product can be
replenished)-->
<entity entity-name="ProductFacilityAssoc"
title="Define associations between Product facilities">
<field name="productId" type="id-ne"/>
<field name="facilityId" type="id-ne"/>
<field name="facilityIdTo" type="id-ne"/>
<field name="facilityAssocTypeId" type="id-ne"/>
<field name="fromDate" type="date-time"/>
<field name="thruDate" type="date-time"/>
<field name="sequenceNum" type="numeric"/>
<prim-key field="productId"/>
<prim-key field="facilityId"/>
<prim-key field="facilityIdTo"/>
<prim-key field="facilityAssocTypeId"/>
<prim-key field="fromDate"/>
<relation type="one" fk-name="PRFACASSOC_PRO" rel-entity-name="Product">
<key-map field-name="productId"/>
</relation>
<relation type="one" fk-name="PRFACASSOC_FAC" title="From"
rel-entity-name="Facility">
<key-map field-name="facilityId"/>
</relation>
<relation type="one" fk-name="PRFACASSOC_FACTO" title="To"
rel-entity-name="Facility">
<key-map field-name="facilityIdTo" rel-field-name="facilityId"/>
</relation>
<relation type="one" fk-name="PRFACASSOC_TYPE"
rel-entity-name="FacilityAssocType">
<key-map field-name="facilityAssocTypeId"/>
</relation>
</entity>
<!-- New Entity FacilityAssocType (type of associations between facilities)-->
<entity entity-name="FacilityAssocType"
title="Define associations between facilities">
<field name="FacilityAssocType" type="id-ne"/>
<field name="description" type="description"/>
<prim-key field="facilityAssocTypeId"/>
</entity>
<!-- New FacilityAssocType (type of association between facilities)-->
<ProductFacilityAssocType productFacilityAssocTypeId="BACKUP_WAREHOUSE"
description="Facility that serves another facility in terms of inventory"/>
<!-- New ProductFacilityAssoc (Association between facilities)-->
<ProductFacilityAssoc productId="GZ-8544" facilityId ="RegionalWarehouse_01"
facilityIdTo="StoreWarehouse_01" facilityAssocTypeId="BACKUP_WAREHOUSE"
sequenceNum="01" fromDate="2001-01-01 12:00:00"/>
<ProductFacilityAssoc productId="GZ-8544" facilityId ="RegionalWarehouse_02"
facilityIdTo="StoreWarehouse_01" facilityAssocTypeId="BACKUP_WAREHOUSE"
sequenceNum="02" fromDate="2001-01-01 12:00:00"/>
<ProductFacilityAssoc productId="GZ-8544" facilityId ="CentralWarehouse"
facilityIdTo="StoreWarehouse_01" facilityAssocTypeId="BACKUP_WAREHOUSE"
sequenceNum="03" fromDate="2001-01-01 12:00:00"/>
<ProductFacilityAssoc productId="GZ-8544" facilityId ="CentralWarehouse"
facilityIdTo="RegionalWarehouse_01" facilityAssocTypeId="BACKUP_WAREHOUSE"
sequenceNum="01" fromDate="2001-01-01 12:00:00"/>
<ProductFacilityAssoc productId="GZ-8544" facilityId ="CentralWarehouse"
facilityIdTo="RegionalWarehouse_02" facilityAssocTypeId="BACKUP_WAREHOUSE"
sequenceNum="01" fromDate="2001-01-01 12:00:00"/>
<!-- New MRPEventType (apart from existing ones in Ofbiz)-->
<MrpEventType description="Initial ATP" mrpEventTypeId="INITIAL_ATP"/>
<MrpEventType description="Proposed stock transfer if ATP is less than minimum
quantity" mrpEventTypeId="PROP_ATP_STOCK_TRANSFER"/>
<!-- New RequirementType (apart from existing ones in Ofbiz)-->
<RequirementType description="Inter-facility Transfer Requirement"
requirementTypeId="TRANSFER_REQUIREMENT"/>
<!-- New Enumeration for Product Store Facility's requirementhMethodEnumId to
be used to trigger inter-facility transfer -->
<Enumeration description="When ATP Reaches Minimum Stock for
Product-Store-Facility" enumCode="XFER_STOCK_ATP" enumId="XFERRQM_STOCK_ATP"
enumTypeId="PROD_REQ_METHOD"/>
<!-- Existing ProductStore for setting primary facility for each store -->
<ProductStore productStoreId="9100" inventoryFacilityId="StoreWarehouse_01"
checkInventory="N" oneInventoryFacility="N" requireInventory="N"
reserveInventory="Y" reserveOrderEnumId="INVRO_FIFO_REC" />
<!-- Extended ProductStoreFacility for setting RMEI)-->
<ProductStoreFacility productStoreId="9100" facilityId=="StoreWarehouse_01"
requirementMethodEnumId="XFERRQM_STOCK_ATP" fromDate="2001-04-13 12:00:00"/>
<!-- Existing ProductFacility (with Minimum Stock and ATP) -->
<ProductFacility facilityId="StoreWarehouse_01" lastInventoryCount="20.000000"
minimumStock="100.000000" productId="GZ-8544"/>
<ProductFacility facilityId="RegionalWarehouse_01"
lastInventoryCount="40.000000" minimumStock="200.000000" productId="GZ-8544"/>
<ProductFacility facilityId="RegionalWarehouse_02"
lastInventoryCount="60.000000" minimumStock="200.000000" productId="GZ-8544"/>
<ProductFacility facilityId="CentralWarehouse" lastInventoryCount="200.000000"
minimumStock="300.000000" productId="GZ-8544"/>
{code}
MRP engine would start creating event beginning with store's primary facility
based on set RMEI under ProductStoreFacility e.g, XFERRQM_STOCK_ATP for
StoreWarehouse_01, In other words if MinStock < ATP , then MRP algorithm would:
# Look up and consume the respective ATP from all the eligible "facilityIdTo"
(based on ProductFacilityAssoc), from where given product is transferable.
Based on their priorities start allocating ATP unless it meet the
(MinStock-ATP) requirement for a given store e.g., 'StoreWarehouse_01' .
# Create new MRP Event with Event type "PROP_ATP_STOCK_TRANSFER" with Proposed
Quantity = MINIMUM STOCK - ATP from the facility (with highest priority
i.e.,RegionalWarehouse_01).
## If demand for (MinStock-ATP) is still not fully met by any facility with
higher priority then repeat step#1 for all the associated facilities in
desecending order of prioriy unless ATP from all eligible facilities is
exhausted.
# Based on above MRP Event Type and proposed quantity, In turn create the new
Requirement with type TRANSFER_REQUIREMENT.
# Over Requirement screen (UI) we can provide the "Transfer" button against all
the requirement with type TRANSFER_REQUIREMENT
# On hitting the "Transfer" button, The new 'Stock Transfer' requests could be
created for a product between eligible facilities based on step#1 above.
# The created Stock Transfer request can be completed by shipping and receiving
given product from originating facility and destination facility respectively.
was (Author: swash78):
Thanks for the detailed feedback and other references. Few thoughts
{quote}
We got to make a start on the concept of replenishment and that's what this is
with the idea of KISS. Let's not confuse the "metaphor" with its dictionary
meaning. We are seeking a metpahor for the sake of implementing a
functionality. At the same time the need is to differentiate it from the
concept of requirements - Product Requirement resulting in purchase orders or
Internal Requirement used mostly for parts/raw material movement for
manufacturing/assembling. Hence, I strongly feel that the word "replenishment"
with the current definition in this context seems apt and enough.
{quote}
I might not have made myself very clear but intention was never to
theoretically or metahorically belabor around the Replenishment concept.
Instead idea is to explore the most commonly used Replenishment "*Policies*"
followed in retail domain across industries that have physical stores spread
across geographically. It could have possibly helped in coming up more holistic
design and solution that could be more widely acceptable (even if we start with
piece-meal apprach or KISS as per your liking).
{quote}
Let's dissect the 'various ways' and see what else can we address in this story
-
i. via inter-store transfers - I would rather have inter-facility transfers to
be specific. We need to understand the difference between inter-store transfer
and inter-facility transfer. What we are actually aiming for in this story is
inter-facility transfer. A store or stores is/are just a front-end for one or
more facilities.
{quote}
Thanks for dissecting it further and Yes, surely we can refer it as
inter-facility transfer. I earlier specified it as inter-store because
requirement would be essentially driven based on Pull from store front for a
given item rather than Push from any associted or backup facility.
{quote}
ii. via local vendors directly - Is already handled via product requirements,
purchase orders and incoming shipments, etc. This is widely referred in OFBiz
as purchase requirements. Hence this no longer needs to be handled.
iii. via drop shipments from vendor's own distribution centers (VMI) etc. - Is
also handled via purchase orders and related process, differing just in the
absence of an incoming shipment. And I would not call it as replenishment in
any way, it is direct order fulfilment or any other terminology.
{quote}
Yes, while its true that in Ofbiz parlance they are kind of purchase
requirement but culminatoin of these process flows in PO generation is not
always necessarily true. On numerous occassions we have seen scenarios where
Store at best can suggest How much & When product need to be replenished based
on sales velocity & forecasted demand to venodrs but they are not necessarily
transformed into purchase orders per se. It is purely vendor's prerogative. In
other words such replenishments works more on *Push* based mechanism from
Vendor and not necessarily driven through PO. So in short YES, for now we can
keep it out from the scope of handling Inter-facility transfer flow but they
should be still considerered for any standard requirement generation flow.
Coming back to the concept of requirement, The Product Requirement resulting
into purchase order and Iternal Requirement into production order is a typical
OFbiz workflow historically and in that sense i agree that auto-refilling of
the store via inter-store(facility) "Stock Transfer" is a new workflow or
possibly an extension of the existing MRP flow.
Based on all these understanding i believe, the core business requirement is
still to have the system to suggest the Requirements in terms of Qty and Timing
based on certain pre-defined set of rules replenishment policies. Subsequently
there might be different ways to further process these requirements like, via
Purchase or Production Orders (based on existing Ofbiz support) or via
Inter-Facility Transfer (by introducing new systemic mechanism to support it)
Also based on the shared Opentaps data, it seems they are using all the exact
same existing set of MrpEventTypeIds for defining InventoryEventPlannedType
along with new needed ones. I am not too sure from architeture and implemention
point of view which could be simpler route to follow. But similar new types
could be added to MrpEventType as well to achieve the desired results by
leveraging upon most of the existing MRP algorithm (and UI support), of course
with needed extension for supporting new modes of processing product
requirements via Transfers. Something like as follows:
Let's say a typical Retail store supply chain setup looks like (as presented in
flow diagram).
!screenshot-1.png!
Introduce new ProductFacilityAssoc,FacilityAssocType, MrpEventType and
corresponding RequirementType to serve the requirement for replenishing the
store's via Inter-facility transfers mode. We could extend the MRP logic to
honor these new types and create corresponding event & requirement for Stock
transfer. The data model & UI could be extended as follows:
{code}
<!-- New Entity ProductFacilityAssoc (Product-wise associations between
facilities to define from what all facilities a given product can be
replenished)-->
<entity entity-name="ProductFacilityAssoc"
title="Define associations between Product facilities">
<field name="productId" type="id-ne"/>
<field name="facilityId" type="id-ne"/>
<field name="facilityIdTo" type="id-ne"/>
<field name="facilityAssocTypeId" type="id-ne"/>
<field name="fromDate" type="date-time"/>
<field name="thruDate" type="date-time"/>
<field name="sequenceNum" type="numeric"/>
<prim-key field="productId"/>
<prim-key field="facilityId"/>
<prim-key field="facilityIdTo"/>
<prim-key field="facilityAssocTypeId"/>
<prim-key field="fromDate"/>
<relation type="one" fk-name="PRFACASSOC_PRO" rel-entity-name="Product">
<key-map field-name="productId"/>
</relation>
<relation type="one" fk-name="PRFACASSOC_FAC" title="From"
rel-entity-name="Facility">
<key-map field-name="facilityId"/>
</relation>
<relation type="one" fk-name="PRFACASSOC_FACTO" title="To"
rel-entity-name="Facility">
<key-map field-name="facilityIdTo" rel-field-name="facilityId"/>
</relation>
<relation type="one" fk-name="PRFACASSOC_TYPE"
rel-entity-name="FacilityAssocType">
<key-map field-name="facilityAssocTypeId"/>
</relation>
</entity>
<!-- New Entity FacilityAssocType (type of associations between facilities)-->
<entity entity-name="FacilityAssocType"
title="Define associations between facilities">
<field name="FacilityAssocType" type="id-ne"/>
<field name="description" type="description"/>
<prim-key field="facilityAssocTypeId"/>
</entity>
<!-- New FacilityAssocType (type of association between facilities)-->
<ProductFacilityAssocType productFacilityAssocTypeId="BACKUP_WAREHOUSE"
description="Facility that serves another facility in terms of inventory"/>
<!-- New ProductFacilityAssoc (Association between facilities)-->
<ProductFacilityAssoc productId="GZ-8544" facilityId ="RegionalWarehouse_01"
facilityIdTo="StoreWarehouse_01" facilityAssocTypeId="BACKUP_WAREHOUSE"
sequenceNum="01" fromDate="2001-01-01 12:00:00"/>
<ProductFacilityAssoc productId="GZ-8544" facilityId ="RegionalWarehouse_02"
facilityIdTo="StoreWarehouse_01" facilityAssocTypeId="BACKUP_WAREHOUSE"
sequenceNum="02" fromDate="2001-01-01 12:00:00"/>
<ProductFacilityAssoc productId="GZ-8544" facilityId ="CentralWarehouse"
facilityIdTo="StoreWarehouse_01" facilityAssocTypeId="BACKUP_WAREHOUSE"
sequenceNum="03" fromDate="2001-01-01 12:00:00"/>
<ProductFacilityAssoc productId="GZ-8544" facilityId ="CentralWarehouse"
facilityIdTo="RegionalWarehouse_01" facilityAssocTypeId="BACKUP_WAREHOUSE"
sequenceNum="01" fromDate="2001-01-01 12:00:00"/>
<ProductFacilityAssoc productId="GZ-8544" facilityId ="CentralWarehouse"
facilityIdTo="RegionalWarehouse_02" facilityAssocTypeId="BACKUP_WAREHOUSE"
sequenceNum="01" fromDate="2001-01-01 12:00:00"/>
<!-- New MRPEventType (apart from existing ones in Ofbiz)-->
<MrpEventType description="Initial ATP" mrpEventTypeId="INITIAL_ATP"/>
<MrpEventType description="Proposed stock transfer if ATP is less than minimum
quantity" mrpEventTypeId="PROP_ATP_STOCK_TRANSFER"/>
<!-- New RequirementType (apart from existing ones in Ofbiz)-->
<RequirementType description="Inter-facility Transfer Requirement"
requirementTypeId="TRANSFER_REQUIREMENT"/>
<!-- New Enumeration for Product Store Facility's requirementhMethodEnumId to
be used to trigger inter-facility transfer -->
<Enumeration description="When ATP Reaches Minimum Stock for
Product-Store-Facility" enumCode="XFER_STOCK_ATP" enumId="XFERRQM_STOCK_ATP"
enumTypeId="PROD_REQ_METHOD"/>
<!-- Existing ProductStore for setting primary facility for each store -->
<ProductStore productStoreId="9100" inventoryFacilityId="StoreWarehouse_01"
checkInventory="N" oneInventoryFacility="N" requireInventory="N"
reserveInventory="Y" reserveOrderEnumId="INVRO_FIFO_REC" />
<!-- Extended ProductStoreFacility for setting RMEI)-->
<ProductStoreFacility productStoreId="9100" facilityId=="StoreWarehouse_01"
requirementMethodEnumId="XFERRQM_STOCK_ATP" fromDate="2001-04-13 12:00:00"/>
<!-- Existing ProductFacility (with Minimum Stock and ATP) -->
<ProductFacility facilityId="StoreWarehouse_01" lastInventoryCount="20.000000"
minimumStock="100.000000" productId="GZ-8544"/>
<ProductFacility facilityId="RegionalWarehouse_01"
lastInventoryCount="40.000000" minimumStock="200.000000" productId="GZ-8544"/>
<ProductFacility facilityId="RegionalWarehouse_02"
lastInventoryCount="60.000000" minimumStock="200.000000" productId="GZ-8544"/>
<ProductFacility facilityId="CentralWarehouse" lastInventoryCount="200.000000"
minimumStock="300.000000" productId="GZ-8544"/>
{code}
MRP engine would start creating event beginning with store's primary facility
based on set RMEI under ProductStoreFacility e.g, XFERRQM_STOCK_ATP for
StoreWarehouse_01, In other words if MinStock < ATP , then MRP algorithm would:
# Look up and consume the respective ATP from all the eligible "facilityIdTo"
(based on ProductFacilityAssoc), from where given product is transferable.
Based on their priorities start allocating ATP unless it meet the
(MinStock-ATP) requirement for a given store e.g., 'StoreWarehouse_01' .
# Create new MRP Event with Event type "PROP_ATP_STOCK_TRANSFER" with Proposed
Quantity = MINIMUM STOCK - ATP from the facility (with highest priority
i.e.,RegionalWarehouse_01).
## If demand for (MinStock-ATP) is still not fully met by any facility with
higher priority then repeat step#1 for all the associated facilities in
desecending order of prioriy unless ATP from all eligible facilities is
exhausted.
# Based on above MRP Event Type and proposed quantity, In turn create the new
Requirement with type TRANSFER_REQUIREMENT.
# Over Requirement screen (UI) we can provide the "Transfer" button against all
the requirement with type TRANSFER_REQUIREMENT
# On hitting the "Transfer" button, The new 'Stock Transfer' requests could be
created for a product between eligible facilities based on step#1 above.
# The created Stock Transfer request can be completed by shipping and receiving
given product from originating facility and destination facility respectively.
> Support for replenishment of a secondary warehouse from a main warehouse
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6964
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6964
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: manufacturing, product
> Reporter: Shrenik Bhura
> Labels: features
> Fix For: Upcoming Branch
>
> Attachments: screenshot-1.png
>
>
> At the onset let me define a few terms clearly as I mean it in the story
> description below :
> Requirement - A request generated for a particular product for a specific
> quantity that needs to be purchased from a supplier for satisfying certain
> inventory needs of a particular facility.
> Replenishment - A request generated for a particular product for a specific
> quantity that needs to be transferred from a "backup facility" for satisfying
> certain inventory needs of a particular facility.
> Fulfilment - The process of reserving, picking, packing and shipping the
> ordered quantity of product(s) as per a sales order.
> Terms 'warehouse' and 'facility' have been used interchangeably.
> *The Use Case:*
> Consider a scenario wherein there is a website and a physical retail store of
> the same Company.
> Each having its own facility i.e. 1:1 mapping.
> {{Store A (webstore) -> associated with facility 1 (webstore facility)}}
> {{Store B (retailstore) -> associated with facility 2 (retailstore facility)}}
> However, both the stores share the same catalog/products. But both have
> independent inventory requirement and replenishment rules for the same
> product.
> There is a Requirement Method Enum ID (RMEI) of each product which is
> applicable irrespective of the store and supersedes the RMEI defined, if any,
> on a store.
> A product's inventory thresholds (Minimum Stock, Reorder Quantity) are
> independently managed via the facilities tab for the product. A product has
> its ATP and QOH levels on a per facility basis. _Do note that all these
> inventory numbers are at a facility level and has no bearing at a store
> level._
> Where the difficulty crops up with the current implementation is the way
> requirements are generated. A product can have only one RMEI. When an order
> is placed from any store, then based on the combination of a product's RMEI
> and the store mapped facility's inventory threshold, requirements are
> generated. This is without consideration of the inventory status (surplus or
> otherwise) at another facility of the same Company. If a store has multiple
> facilities associated with it then the one defined in the ProductStore entity
> -> inventoryFacilityId field would be considered for picking the inventory
> threshold values and thus for requirement generation.
> Most typical real-world facility arrangements:
> 1. Usually an organisation would have a main facility/warehouse where
> all the purchases are received and sub-facilities which are replenished from
> the main facility after QA, internal processes, etc. OR
> 2. For each product there would be a primary facility where the product
> is received from the supplier (to derive benefits of demographic convenience
> and consumption patterns) and then replenished to other facilities on a
> demand based pull basis.
> To drive efficiencies across an organisation they need methods to consider
> open fulfilment needs, in process purchase orders and inventory levels across
> multiple facilities and thereafter propose inventory transfers across them to
> facilitate better stocking and thus order fulfilment.
> Coming back to our use case, the webstore warehouse is the main facility at
> which incoming shipments from suppliers are received for the entire Company
> but sales order fulfilment happens only for the webstore. The retail
> warehouse is primarily 're-stocked' via replenishment requests raised upon
> the webstore warehouse and thus need not issue direct purchase orders to
> suppliers. However, if the need be, requirement generated based on the
> product's RMEI and the retail facility's inventory thresholds can also be
> approved, converted into Purchase order and issued.
> *Proposed Solution:*
> There doesn't seem to be an out of the box solution for this in OFBiz. This
> could work if either we think of -
> Approach A: Setting RMEI at a ProductFacility level as well which shall
> supersede the Product level RMEI setting OR
> Approach B: Build in support for a solution that I have encountered in
> Opentaps (a system built atop OFBiz) i.e. implement support for a new setting
> *Replenishment Method Enum ID (RPMEI)* and the concept of *Backup Facility*.
> The obvious difficulty with Approach A could be the need to modify existing
> logic everywhere RMEI is being used and _may_ be difficult to implement and
> validate (must confess that I have not given this approach much more
> thought). On the contrary the Approach B seems a safer method to add this
> feature with minimum possibility of breaking existing functionality.
> _Herein is the Approach B in detail-_
>
> Introduce a ProductFacility specific *Replenishment Method Enum ID (RPMEI)*
> with values such as -
> **Code snippets are from Opentaps**
> {code:xml}
> <!-- Enumeration for ProductFacility replenishMethodEnumId -->
> <EnumerationType enumTypeId="PFAC_REPL_METHOD" hasTable="N"
> description="Product Facility Replenish Methods"/>
> <Enumeration enumId="PF_RM_NEVER" description="Never transfer"
> enumTypeId="PFAC_REPL_METHOD"/>
> <Enumeration enumId="PF_RM_BACKUP" description="Transfer from backup
> warehouse if available" enumTypeId="PFAC_REPL_METHOD"/>
> <Enumeration enumId="PF_RM_SPECIF" description="Transfer from specified
> warehouse if available" enumTypeId="PFAC_REPL_METHOD"/>
> <Enumeration enumId="PF_RM_BACKUP_ALW" description="Always transfer from
> backup warehouse" enumTypeId="PFAC_REPL_METHOD"/>
> <Enumeration enumId="PF_RM_SPECIF_ALW" description="Always transfer from
> specified warehouse" enumTypeId="PFAC_REPL_METHOD"/>
> {code}
> and extend the entity ProductFacility -
> {code:xml}
> <extend-entity entity-name="ProductFacility">
> <field name="replenishMethodEnumId" type="id"/>
> <field name="replenishFromFacilityId" type="id-ne"/>
> <relation type="one" rel-entity-name="Facility" fk-name="PF_R_FAC"
> title="ResplenishFromFacility">
> <key-map field-name="facilityId"/>
> </relation>
> <relation title="ResplenishMethod" fk-name="PF_R_METH"
> rel-entity-name="Enumeration" type="one">
> <key-map field-name="replenishMethodEnumId" rel-field-name="enumId"/>
> </relation>
> </extend-entity>
> {code}
> Create new entities -
> {code:xml}
> <entity entity-name="FacilityAssoc"
> package-name="org.opentaps.common.facility"
> title="Define associations between facilities">
> <field name="facilityId" type="id-ne"/>
> <field name="facilityIdTo" type="id-ne"/>
> <field name="facilityAssocTypeId" type="id-ne"/>
> <field name="fromDate" type="date-time"/>
> <field name="thruDate" type="date-time"/>
> <field name="sequenceNum" type="numeric"/>
> <prim-key field="facilityId"/>
> <prim-key field="facilityIdTo"/>
> <prim-key field="facilityAssocTypeId"/>
> <prim-key field="fromDate"/>
> <relation type="one" fk-name="FACASSOC_FAC" title="From"
> rel-entity-name="Facility">
> <key-map field-name="facilityId"/>
> </relation>
> <relation type="one" fk-name="FACASSOC_FACTO" title="To"
> rel-entity-name="Facility">
> <key-map field-name="facilityIdTo" rel-field-name="facilityId"/>
> </relation>
> <relation type="one" fk-name="FACASSOC_TYPE"
> rel-entity-name="FacilityAssocType">
> <key-map field-name="facilityAssocTypeId"/>
> </relation>
> </entity>
> <entity entity-name="FacilityAssocType"
> package-name="org.opentaps.common.facility"
> title="Define associations between facilities">
> <field name="facilityAssocTypeId" type="id-ne"/>
> <field name="description" type="description"/>
> <prim-key field="facilityAssocTypeId"/>
> </entity>
> <FacilityAssocType facilityAssocTypeId="BACKUP_INVENTORY" description="Holds
> backup inventory"/>
> {code}
> Hence now we can define a replenishment method at a product level and that
> too on a per facility basis.
> Additional now we can provision for defining of backup facility for any
> facility. (May consider using the parentFacilityId available on the Facility
> entity but am not sure about its purpose and there is no way to define the
> relation between the parent and child.)
> We have to safeguard these:
> 1. There should be no direct or indirect cyclic backup facility
> relation between any 2 facilities due to backup facility relation definition.
> 2. There should be no direct or indirect cyclic replenishment facility
> relation created due to defining of replenishFromFacilityId in a
> ProductFacility entry for a product.
> Now when an order is placed on the retail store and ATP falls below Minimum
> Stock at the primary facility mapped to the retail store, then depending on
> the product's or store's RMEI setting combined with the facility's inventory
> thresholds a purchase requirement may be generated. However, we are not
> interested in this and may even block the generation of such a purchase
> requirement for product's which have a RPMEI defined for a particular
> facility.
> Instead on a subsequent MRP run for the retailstore facility, based on the
> open sales orders, we should generate/propose 'Inventory transfer
> requirement' from the _backup facility_ or the _replenishFromFacilityId_
> depending on what's defined in the ProductFacility entity.
> This solution should hold good even in the case of many:many mapping between
> stores and facilities as existing implementation is to reserve inventory
> against the facility that is mapped to the store via inventoryFacilityId.
> Hence there is no chance of the same sales order resulting in redundant
> requirements on multiple facilities.
> And since the RPMEI (Replenishment Method Enum Id) is defined at the
> ProductFacility level there is no possibility of a general setting of RPMEI
> at a facility or store level to compete with.
> This seems to be a rather important feature without which many businesses
> operating brick and mortar stores as well as an ecommerce web-front can't
> favourable use OFBiz.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
