Hi Jacques, If that is the case, I don't see any reason to object.
Best regards, Pierre Smits ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com> OFBiz based solutions & services OFBiz Extensions Marketplace http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Taher Alkhateeb < slidingfilame...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Jacques Le Roux < > jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > > > Nope, simply that we will no longer see the JackRabbit branch when > filling > > the Fix Version/s field, which is disturbing, same for Bootstrap > > > > Jacques > > > > > > > > Le 18/07/2016 à 11:31, Pierre Smits a écrit : > > > >> Your assumption and suggestion applies to many more branches than just > the > >> 2 mentioned, but only 2 were registered in JIRA. > >> > >> What does that 'archive it in Jira' entail? Will associated issues be > >> removed from JIRA? > >> > >> Best regards, > >> > >> > >> Pierre Smits > >> > >> ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com> > >> OFBiz based solutions & services > >> > >> OFBiz Extensions Marketplace > >> http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ > >> > >> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Jacques Le Roux < > >> jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >>> > >>> I believe the JackRabbit branch is now completely unmergeable. I > suggest > >>> that we archive it in Jira. It adds only confusion there. Same for the > >>> the > >>> Boostrap theme? > >>> > >>> I see no problems keeping all branches even old in the repo, it does > >>> annoy > >>> there. > >>> > >>> Thanks > >>> > >>> Jacques > >>> > >>> > >>> > > >
