The above patch does not work Jacques, you are hard coding the path. This
needs to be properly developed.

On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 9:23 AM, Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:

> OK wait! I think we skipped a step: access the jar from an accessible repo.
>
> I see 2 solutions:
>
> 1. Push ourselves the notsoserial jar in jcenter => updating a fork now
> and then, though notsoserial will not need much changes now
> 2. Use https://jitpack.io/
>
> I prefer 2, though I have still to
>
>  * resolve the notsoserial.jar path in my hasty proposition below
>  * use|master-SNAPSHOT| instead of last hash (to not break on changes)
> which may need to refresh dependencies (did not investigate yet:
>    https://jitpack.io/docs/#snapshots)
>
> Index: build.gradle
> ===================================================================
> --- build.gradle    (revision 1759557)
> +++ build.gradle    (working copy)
> @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@
>
>  // java settings
>  def jvmArguments = ['-Xms128M', '-Xmx1024M',
> - "-javaagent:${rootDir}/tools/security/notsoserial/notsoseria
> l-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar",
> + "-javaagent:C:/Users/Jacques/.gradle/caches/modules-2/files-
> 2.1/com.github.kantega/notsoserial/f2baaaa/3646e12f5ce4713f9
> ad2aa027e3fec81097fcd93/notsoserial-f2baaaa.jar",
> "-Dnotsoserial.whitelist=${rootDir}/tools/security/notsoserial/empty.txt",
> "-Dnotsoserial.dryrun=${rootDir}/tools/security/notsoserial/
> is-deserialized.txt",
> "-Dnotsoserial.trace=${rootDir}/tools/security/notsoserial/
> deserialize-trace.txt"]
> @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@
>  allprojects {
>      repositories{
>          jcenter()
> +        maven { url "https://jitpack.io"; }
>      }
>  }
>
> @@ -119,6 +120,7 @@
>      compile 'org.zapodot:jackson-databind-java-optional:2.4.2'
>      compile 'oro:oro:2.0.8'
>      compile 'wsdl4j:wsdl4j:1.6.2'
> +    compile 'com.github.kantega:notsoserial:f2baaaa'
>
>      // general framework runtime libs
>      runtime 'de.odysseus.juel:juel-spi:2.2.7'
>
> I think you get the idea, it works w/o any other modifications, what to
> you think?
>
> Jacques
>
>
>
> Le 07/09/2016 à 22:37, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
>
>> OK, since we have no issues OOTB that can be done.
>>
>> But IMO documenting the whole thing in our nososerial readme.txt is not
>> enough. We need to make that more prominent. Not sure how yet...
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>>
>> Le 07/09/2016 à 20:09, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit :
>>
>>> Scratch that, actually only the -D arguments are ignored, we must remove
>>> the -javaagent argument because it's not a classpath argument and would
>>> crash the VM
>>>
>>> But for consistency's sake, let's remove them all for now. So simply we
>>> apply:
>>>
>>> Index: build.gradle
>>> ===================================================================
>>> --- build.gradle        (revision 1759596)
>>> +++ build.gradle        (working copy)
>>> @@ -31,11 +31,7 @@
>>>   ext.os = System.getProperty('os.name').toLowerCase()
>>>
>>>   // java settings
>>> -def jvmArguments = ['-Xms128M', '-Xmx1024M',
>>> -
>>> "-javaagent:${rootDir}/tools/security/notsoserial/notsoseria
>>> l-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar",
>>> -
>>> "-Dnotsoserial.whitelist=${rootDir}/tools/security/notsoseri
>>> al/empty.txt",
>>> -
>>> "-Dnotsoserial.dryrun=${rootDir}/tools/security/notsoserial/
>>> is-deserialized.txt",
>>> -
>>> "-Dnotsoserial.trace=${rootDir}/tools/security/notsoserial/
>>> deserialize-trace.txt"]
>>> +def jvmArguments = ['-Xms128M', '-Xmx1024M']
>>>   ext.ofbizMainClass = 'org.apache.ofbiz.base.start.Start'
>>>   javadoc.failOnError = false
>>>   sourceCompatibility = '1.8'
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 9:04 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
>>> jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> OK Cool, if the JVM arguments are simply ignored, then I will proceed
>>>> with
>>>> an addition in the readme and remove the jar, simple
>>>>
>>>> Jacques
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Le 07/09/2016 à 17:16, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
>>>>
>>>> Thank you Jacques and Taher.
>>>>>
>>>>> So it seems we can move on and temporarily remove the jar.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jacopo
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 5:11 PM, Taher Alkhateeb <
>>>>> slidingfilame...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Jacques,
>>>>>
>>>>>> First of all the ofbizSecure task is gone instead everything calls the
>>>>>> correct jvm arguments by default to fetch notsoserial.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The work to remove notsoserial is almost nothing. You just to remove a
>>>>>> few
>>>>>> jvm args and that's it. Even if you don't remove the jvm args nothing
>>>>>> happens because it will just ignore it as missing from the classpath.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Taher Alkhateeb
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sep 7, 2016 5:48 PM, "Jacques Le Roux" <
>>>>>> jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Huho, I was too fast on this. Currently the Gradle "ofbizSecure" tasks
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> depends on the notsoserial-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So this would need more work and w/o answers from them I suspect they
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>
>>>>>> not publish the jar.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Now it's a serious security but not OOTB. So I see 2 possibilities.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1. Ask the ASF for a derogation (after all it's a Java issue not an
>>>>>>> OFBiz
>>>>>>> one)
>>>>>>> 2. Do what I said before AND change the Gradle "ofbizSecure" tasks
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Opinions?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Le 07/09/2016 à 14:01, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes I see no problems with that. I just need to add directions for
>>>>>>> users
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> before. I'll then remove the jars... very soon...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Le 07/09/2016 à 13:09, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jacques, any news from notsoserial?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If not, I think we can proceed by (temporarily) removing the jars
>>>>>>>>> until
>>>>>>>>> they will publish the jar.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Jacopo
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Jacques Le Roux <
>>>>>>>>> jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes that's what I proposed also, I will try that before the worse
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> solution
>>>>>>>>>> as Taher called them, would you help?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Le 20/08/2016 à 08:32, Pierre Smits a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jacques,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Why not try to convince the people behind notsoserial to have them
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> push
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> library to maven central and/or jpublish? In stead of this community
>>>>>>>>>>> doing
>>>>>>>>>>> the work?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Pierre Smits
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> OFBiz based solutions & services
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
>>>>>>>>>>> http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to