Jacques, I am glad that you finally agreed upon my initial interpretation of the policy. It took time (for the community and the legal team [*]) to explain to you and Pierre that your original interpretation was incorrect but I am glad we are now all on the same page and we can move on and work at more valuable tasks.
Kind regards, Jacopo [*] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/cdc08a88d47709738c4aa75 95a3dc2446e7aa5450d4b6ffc8cc56b52@%3Clegal-discuss.apache.org%3E On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:38 PM, Jacques Le Roux < [email protected]> wrote: > I agree we should have a AL2 (and not ASL2 I learnt) header in README.md. > > For the rest it really depends on the content and we can't apply a global > rule. Only "creative" ones should have a header. Of course "creative" is > subjective, but I guess in most cases we will agree. > > Jacques > > > > Le 16/09/2016 à 13:46, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit : > >> Well, for the README.md you can add the license using the HTML version in >> APACHE2_HEADER. For the rest of the README files you can use the standard >> header. >> >> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Jacques Le Roux < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> Le 16/09/2016 à 12:31, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 12:24 PM, Jacques Le Roux < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> I simply wonder how we, as a community, can decide on this subject if no >>>> >>>>> vote can be done. >>>>> >>>>> Jacques >>>>> >>>>> Jacques, please do not be elusive... I am simply asking you if this >>>>> vote >>>>> >>>> is >>>> still valid or you have cancelled it. >>>> >>>> Jacopo >>>> >>>> OK, I cancelled the vote because "it makes no sense to force to have an >>>> >>> ASL2 headers in ALL readme files", now what? >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> >>> >
