Jacopo,
I'm glad we also agree about not blindly putting an Alv2 header in all readme
files
Jacques
Le 17/09/2016 à 08:42, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
Jacques,
I am glad that you finally agreed upon my initial interpretation of the
policy.
It took time (for the community and the legal team [*]) to explain to you
and Pierre that your original interpretation was incorrect but I am glad we
are now all on the same page and we can move on and work at more valuable
tasks.
Kind regards,
Jacopo
[*] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/cdc08a88d47709738c4aa75
95a3dc2446e7aa5450d4b6ffc8cc56b52@%3Clegal-discuss.apache.org%3E
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:38 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
[email protected]> wrote:
I agree we should have a AL2 (and not ASL2 I learnt) header in README.md.
For the rest it really depends on the content and we can't apply a global
rule. Only "creative" ones should have a header. Of course "creative" is
subjective, but I guess in most cases we will agree.
Jacques
Le 16/09/2016 à 13:46, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit :
Well, for the README.md you can add the license using the HTML version in
APACHE2_HEADER. For the rest of the README files you can use the standard
header.
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
[email protected]> wrote:
Le 16/09/2016 à 12:31, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 12:24 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
[email protected]> wrote:
I simply wonder how we, as a community, can decide on this subject if no
vote can be done.
Jacques
Jacques, please do not be elusive... I am simply asking you if this
vote
is
still valid or you have cancelled it.
Jacopo
OK, I cancelled the vote because "it makes no sense to force to have an
ASL2 headers in ALL readme files", now what?
Jacques
