Jacopo,
I saw you answered on Confluence where I 1st asked
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBADMIN/OFBiz+commit+message+template?focusedCommentId=65871637#comment-65871637
Now, I understand that we need to pick a word, but why not being more flexible, similarly at what does GitHub
https://help.github.com/articles/closing-issues-via-commit-messages/ ?
I already suggested in previous threads that I could help if the process
Michael uses to create the blog monthly report needs to be adapted.
In relation, I also created in the "Wiki page for the "monthly Jira issues list"
creation in the blog" thread, without any answers so far :/
Thanks
Jacques
Le 22/09/2016 à 08:45, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi Jacopo,
What is the logical behind this? It's not the first time I ask and I'd really
like to have a clarification.
We have "Fix for" and "Documentation". Why not "Fixed" and "Documented"?
Thanks
Jacques
Le 21/09/2016 à 19:09, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
I have changed it to "Reverted" for consistency reasons.
Jacopo
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 7:01 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
[email protected]> wrote:
Done
Jacques
Le 18/09/2016 à 11:19, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi,
In some cases we need to revert a commit done for a Jira after we
discover it causes an issue. We have not yet other means that using the fix
word.
I suggest we put in the "Reverts" (or "Revert for" or "Reverted" as it
please you) word in the commit template for this reason.
Because it's a different thing than really fixing the initial issue
reported in the Jira but it's sill related to it
What do you think?
Jacques
