I apologise for any inconvenience caused. Using JIRA as tool to 'blame' a committer when something goes sour is not the best what comes to my mind. There are other services of the ASF that help in that respect, such as ViewVC and FishEye. Those tools provide way better means to assess who committed what and when (even for statistical purposes).
Best regards, Pierre Smits ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com> OFBiz based solutions & services OFBiz Extensions Marketplace http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Michael Brohl <michael.br...@ecomify.de> wrote: > Hi Scott, > > thanks for trying to clarify and giving your opinion on this. > > See my remarks inline. > > > Am 30.04.17 um 04:30 schrieb Scott Gray: > >> I would prefer they were left assigned to the committer since the onus >> tends to fall on them if there are any post closure issues. >> > > Exactly what I would prefer also. In most cases the commit and backporting > is the last action taken and should be recorded as such. > > My guess if that Pierre wants to track what tickets he contributed to >> beyond being the reporter. Could you confirm Pierre? >> >> Beyond what I've mentioned is there any other reason you have an issue >> with >> it Michael? >> > I think it is against the natural workflow as mentioned above. I cannot > remember that anyone else assigns tickets back to himself after they are > finished. > > It falsifies the statistics to reassign issues, especially if they are old. > > When it comes to contributions, the committer contribution would be hidden. > > It produces unnecessary traffic in Jira and the notification mailing lists > and adds nothing valuable. > >> >> Just trying to figure out everyone's reasoning so we can work towards a >> solution. >> > > Thanks Scott, that's what I was trying to achieve also in my last two > questions to Pierre. > >> >> Regards >> Scott >> >> Regards, > Michael > > > > On 29/04/2017 11:45 PM, "Michael Brohl" <michael.br...@ecomify.de> wrote: >> >> Hi Pierre, >> >> you are again reassigning lots of old and already closed Jiras to >> yourself. >> Can you please stop this and give us an explanation why you are doing so? >> >> Thanks, >> Michael >> >> >> Am 23.04.2017 um 15:56 schrieb Michael Brohl <michael.br...@ecomify.de>: >>> >>> Hi Pierre, >>> >>> what's the reason to reassign old and already closed issues to yourself >>> again? >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Michael >>> >>> >>> Am 23.04.17 um 13:06 schrieb Pierre Smits (JIRA): >>>> [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-8232?page= >>>> >>> com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] >> >>> Pierre Smits reassigned OFBIZ-8232: >>>> ----------------------------------- >>>> >>>> Assignee: Pierre Smits (was: Jacopo Cappellato) >>>> >>>> Improve Dutch labels for commonext component >>>>> -------------------------------------------- >>>>> >>>>> Key: OFBIZ-8232 >>>>> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-8232 >>>>> Project: OFBiz >>>>> Issue Type: Improvement >>>>> Components: commonext >>>>> Affects Versions: Trunk >>>>> Reporter: Pierre Smits >>>>> Assignee: Pierre Smits >>>>> Priority: Minor >>>>> Labels: labels, refactoring >>>>> Fix For: 16.11.01 >>>>> >>>>> Attachments: OFBIZ-8232-CommonExtUiLabels.xml.patch >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA >>>> (v6.3.15#6346) >>>> >>> >>> > >
