Pierre,you are still reassigning lots of old Jiras to yourself without answering our questions why you are doing so.
Please stop it and give us your reasons why you are doing so. Thanks, Michael Am 02.05.17 um 09:36 schrieb Pierre Smits:
I apologise for any inconvenience caused. Using JIRA as tool to 'blame' a committer when something goes sour is not the best what comes to my mind. There are other services of the ASF that help in that respect, such as ViewVC and FishEye. Those tools provide way better means to assess who committed what and when (even for statistical purposes). Best regards, Pierre Smits ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com> OFBiz based solutions & services OFBiz Extensions Marketplace http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Michael Brohl <[email protected]> wrote:Hi Scott, thanks for trying to clarify and giving your opinion on this. See my remarks inline. Am 30.04.17 um 04:30 schrieb Scott Gray:I would prefer they were left assigned to the committer since the onus tends to fall on them if there are any post closure issues.Exactly what I would prefer also. In most cases the commit and backporting is the last action taken and should be recorded as such. My guess if that Pierre wants to track what tickets he contributed tobeyond being the reporter. Could you confirm Pierre? Beyond what I've mentioned is there any other reason you have an issue with it Michael?I think it is against the natural workflow as mentioned above. I cannot remember that anyone else assigns tickets back to himself after they are finished. It falsifies the statistics to reassign issues, especially if they are old. When it comes to contributions, the committer contribution would be hidden. It produces unnecessary traffic in Jira and the notification mailing lists and adds nothing valuable.Just trying to figure out everyone's reasoning so we can work towards a solution.Thanks Scott, that's what I was trying to achieve also in my last two questions to Pierre.Regards Scott Regards,Michael On 29/04/2017 11:45 PM, "Michael Brohl" <[email protected]> wrote:Hi Pierre, you are again reassigning lots of old and already closed Jiras to yourself. Can you please stop this and give us an explanation why you are doing so? Thanks, Michael Am 23.04.2017 um 15:56 schrieb Michael Brohl <[email protected]>:Hi Pierre, what's the reason to reassign old and already closed issues to yourself again? Regards, Michael Am 23.04.17 um 13:06 schrieb Pierre Smits (JIRA):[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-8232?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Pierre Smits reassigned OFBIZ-8232:----------------------------------- Assignee: Pierre Smits (was: Jacopo Cappellato) Improve Dutch labels for commonext component-------------------------------------------- Key: OFBIZ-8232 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-8232 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Improvement Components: commonext Affects Versions: Trunk Reporter: Pierre Smits Assignee: Pierre Smits Priority: Minor Labels: labels, refactoring Fix For: 16.11.01 Attachments: OFBIZ-8232-CommonExtUiLabels.xml.patch-- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
