Yes, I like the consistency. Carl
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 1:28 AM, Bolz, Michael <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi together, > > In the OLINGO-83 issue we discuss [1] if we should rename the package > names in the jpa-processor module to be consistent over all “processor” > modules. > > But this change mandates that all users which upgrades from 1.0.0 to 1.1.0 > onwards needs to refactor their code. > Normally just a package renaming does not result in a big impact, because > you have to fix the imports (which is with an modern IDE mostly just an > _fix imports_). > > So in my opinion we should rename the packages in the "jpa-processor" > module. > > What do you think? > > Kind regards, > Michael > > [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OLINGO-83 > [2]: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OLINGO-83?focusedCommentId=13855124&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13855124 > -- Carl J. Mosca
