Hello All, I would like to go ahead with these changes as there was "no" to go ahead from any one.
I would like to give the link to Carl's reply (archived and I missed this mail from my Inbox L) http://markmail.org/message/pmk37f3mvsfgwvjx where he had also liked the idea to go with the changes in the package renaming. JIRA Issue OLINGO-99<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OLINGO-99> created as subtask of OLINGO-83. Thanks Kind Regards Chandan From: Bolz, Michael [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 11:58 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Renaming of "jpa-processor" module packages * PGP Signature not checked Hi together, In the OLINGO-83 issue we discuss [1] if we should rename the package names in the jpa-processor module to be consistent over all "processor" modules. But this change mandates that all users which upgrades from 1.0.0 to 1.1.0 onwards needs to refactor their code. Normally just a package renaming does not result in a big impact, because you have to fix the imports (which is with an modern IDE mostly just an _fix imports_). So in my opinion we should rename the packages in the "jpa-processor" module. What do you think? Kind regards, Michael [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OLINGO-83 [2]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OLINGO-83?focusedCommentId=13855124&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13855124 * Signature checking is off by policy
