My Personal favor goes to jackson but org.json will also do :-) Regards, Stein
On 19 sep. 2013, at 08:54, Tommaso Teofili <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Simo, > > org.json would be fine (and Jackson would be good as well) so no objection > on my side as I suspect that will also grant better performance. > > Regards, > Tommaso > > > 2013/9/18 Simone Tripodi <[email protected]> > >> Hi all guys, >> >> I would like to discuss with you all about replacing jettison with >> org.json. >> >> The big advantage I see is reading/writing JSON data without generating >> intermediary DOM structures, this is really useful since we manipulate our >> entities. >> >> WDYT? Any objection? >> >> TIA, all the best! >> -Simo >> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi >>
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
