Maybe better will be if you will create adapter interface and everybody will be able to use favorite JSON library? :-)
Cheers, Łukasz Dywicki -- [email protected] Twitter: ldywicki Blog: http://dywicki.pl Code-House - http://code-house.org Wiadomość napisana przez Stein Welberg <[email protected]> w dniu 19 wrz 2013, o godz. 10:44: > My Personal favor goes to jackson but org.json will also do :-) > > Regards, > Stein > > > On 19 sep. 2013, at 08:54, Tommaso Teofili <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Simo, >> >> org.json would be fine (and Jackson would be good as well) so no objection >> on my side as I suspect that will also grant better performance. >> >> Regards, >> Tommaso >> >> >> 2013/9/18 Simone Tripodi <[email protected]> >> >>> Hi all guys, >>> >>> I would like to discuss with you all about replacing jettison with >>> org.json. >>> >>> The big advantage I see is reading/writing JSON data without generating >>> intermediary DOM structures, this is really useful since we manipulate our >>> entities. >>> >>> WDYT? Any objection? >>> >>> TIA, all the best! >>> -Simo >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi >>> >
