I am honestly for keeping the onami- prefix, the reason is that groupId is just metadata, artifactId is also the name that will be assigned to the produced artifact - once on the filesystem, while `autobind` would be self-explanatory, `logging` would be a little confusing :P
Thanks! -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Christian Grobmeier <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Autobind: > > <artifactId>autobind-parent</artifactId> > > Loggin: > > <artifactId>onami-logging-log4j</artifactId> > <artifactId>onami-logging-parent</artifactId> > > Can we agree on either prefixing everything with onami or with > removing the prefix for every component? > > As there is a groupId containing org.apache.onami I would prefer > removing the prefix > > Any objections? > > Cheers > Christian > > -- > http://www.grobmeier.de > https://www.timeandbill.de
