No problem, i am already convinced. And fixed the missing prefix in autobind (which btw, does not compile currently)
revision 1414970 On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Jordi Gerona <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 also for keeping onami prefix. > > also artifactId usually is the name of the final jar. You can end with > multiple "logging" jars in your lib folder... > > > On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Daniel Manzke <[email protected] >> wrote: > >> +1 for keeping it (after I was convinced by simo :)) >> >> >> 2012/11/28 Simone Tripodi <[email protected]> >> >> > yes, autobind is a component that I haven't touched yet - feel free to >> > play with it if you have some spare time! >> > >> > TIA! >> > -Simo >> > >> > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >> > http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ >> > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi >> > http://www.99soft.org/ >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Christian Grobmeier >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Simone Tripodi >> > > <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> I am honestly for keeping the onami- prefix, the reason is that >> > >> groupId is just metadata, artifactId is also the name that will be >> > >> assigned to the produced artifact - once on the filesystem, while >> > >> `autobind` would be self-explanatory, `logging` would be a little >> > >> confusing :P >> > > >> > > OK makes sense. Then lets use the prefix for all components from now >> on? >> > > >> > >> >> > >> Thanks! >> > >> -Simo >> > >> >> > >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >> > >> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ >> > >> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi >> > >> http://www.99soft.org/ >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Christian Grobmeier >> > >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >>> Hi, >> > >>> >> > >>> Autobind: >> > >>> >> > >>> <artifactId>autobind-parent</artifactId> >> > >>> >> > >>> Loggin: >> > >>> >> > >>> <artifactId>onami-logging-log4j</artifactId> >> > >>> <artifactId>onami-logging-parent</artifactId> >> > >>> >> > >>> Can we agree on either prefixing everything with onami or with >> > >>> removing the prefix for every component? >> > >>> >> > >>> As there is a groupId containing org.apache.onami I would prefer >> > >>> removing the prefix >> > >>> >> > >>> Any objections? >> > >>> >> > >>> Cheers >> > >>> Christian >> > >>> >> > >>> -- >> > >>> http://www.grobmeier.de >> > >>> https://www.timeandbill.de >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > http://www.grobmeier.de >> > > https://www.timeandbill.de >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Viele Grüße/Best Regards >> >> Daniel Manzke >> -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de
