Well Tom my justification for my +1 was that there has been a bunch of
other issues addressed.
At end of the day it is down to release managers digression.
I am happy to see 0.8.1 going out as is per release candidate.
The script update instructions are documented within the release procedure
so we will catch them the next time around.
My VOTE stands as +1
Thanks
Lewis

On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Tom Barber <tom.bar...@meteorite.bi> wrote:

> I've not looked, but don't you need to unpeg Radix so the fix that 0.8.1
> was built for in the first place goes through?
>
> Tom
>
> On 08/02/15 21:44, Lewis John Mcgibbney wrote:
>
>> Hi Chris,
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) <
>> chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
>>
>>  The release was made from the OODT 0.8.1 tag (r1658019) at:
>>>
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/oodt/tags/0.8.1/
>>>
>>>  I've checked both of the tags for the OODT version within the radix
>> archetype script
>>
>> Both RC's at [0] and [1] have OODT version pegged to 0.8 rather than 0.8.1
>>
>> [0]
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/oodt/tags/0.8.1-rc1/mvn/
>> archetypes/radix/src/main/resources/bin/radix
>> [1]
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/oodt/tags/0.8.1/mvn/
>> archetypes/radix/src/main/resources/bin/radix
>>
>> MD5: matches
>> SHA1: matches
>> Signature: Chris Mattmann (CODE SIGNING KEY) <mattm...@apache.org>
>> Python tests: pass
>> Java tests: pass
>>
>> All good for me except for the radix script.
>> What do people think?
>>
>> Personally, I am +1 as this is not a blocking issue.
>>
>> Lewis
>>
>>
>
> --
> *Tom Barber* | Technical Director
>
> meteorite bi
> *T:* +44 20 8133 3730
> *W:* www.meteorite.bi | *Skype:* meteorite.consulting
> *A:* Surrey Technology Centre, Surrey Research Park, Guildford, GU2 7YG, UK
>



-- 
*Lewis*

Reply via email to