Actually, maybe we can get them to use it on the Sonar server. I'll
investigate and ask infra.

Tom

On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Tom Barber <tom.bar...@meteorite.bi> wrote:

> Hi Lewis,
>
> No problem, I thought about adding it to Jenkins but I don't think we
> publish the site docs automatically currently, so there is little point. If
> someone knows how we can publish the site docs after each build, then yes
> it would be great to add it to the jenkins build.
>
> Tom
>
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:13 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney <
> lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Nice Tom.
>> Will add the directions to the website documentation as I think there is
>> an
>> area for eat coverage.
>> We adding this to the Jenkins build yes?
>>
>> On Thursday, October 15, 2015, Tom Barber <tom.bar...@meteorite.bi>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Okay they sent me the new license, its in our root pom.xml but doesn't
>> have
>> > any effect on the build, you need to run it manually:
>> >
>> > mvn clover2:setup test clover2:aggregate clover2:clover
>> > -Dmaven.test.failure.ignore=true
>> >
>> > for example and it will report to the site folder.
>> >
>> > The plugin is in the committers donated licenses folder in SVN, it is a
>> > license for org.apache.* so if you want to use it on another project to
>> use
>> > the same license.
>> >
>> > Tom
>> >
>> > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney <
>> > lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Sound
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Tom Barber <magicaltr...@apache.org
>> > <javascript:;>>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Okay, had a bit of a search of the mailing list archive and found a
>> > > Clover
>> > > > license, so I added it to the pom, sadly its out of date!
>> > > >
>> > > > I'll check with Atlassian and see if we can get a renewal, the old
>> one
>> > > was
>> > > > licensed for all org.apache.* packages so all projects could use it,
>> > > > hopefully we can get another one the same.
>> > > >
>> > > > Tom
>> > > >
>> > > > On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 9:51 PM, Tom Barber <
>> tom.bar...@meteorite.bi
>> > <javascript:;>>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Yeah I use the clover report all the time in real life and its
>> great
>> > > for
>> > > > > stuff like OODT but its an Atlassian product, so I just ran it on
>> my
>> > > > laptop
>> > > > > using my own open source license. Technically we would qualify
>> for an
>> > > > open
>> > > > > source license, but I don't know what the ASF policy is, or, they
>> > might
>> > > > > already have a license in which case, absolutely, its just
>> published
>> > > with
>> > > > > the standard Maven Site.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > If no one else knows, I can check with Infra, Sonar also is
>> supposed
>> > to
>> > > > > have code coverage but its not visible so I don't know if they
>> > disable
>> > > > it,
>> > > > > also Clover reports can be used by Sonar, so there is some
>> crossover
>> > > > there.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Tom
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 9:48 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney <
>> > > > > lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > >> This is also extremely useful. How did you generate the report?
>> Can
>> > we
>> > > > >> automate this as part of builds against master?
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> On Saturday, October 10, 2015, Tom Barber <
>> tom.bar...@meteorite.bi
>> > <javascript:;>>
>> > > > >> wrote:
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> > On top of the Sonar stuff, I ran Atlassian Clover over the
>> whole
>> > > > >> project to
>> > > > >> > get some coverage stats.
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > The results of which you can find here:
>> > > > >> > http://www.meteorite.bi/downloads/clover/
>> > > > >> > As you can see we currently stand as 26% coverage. Handily the
>> > > clover
>> > > > >> > report tells us some stuff about what's missing. So on top of
>> > > cleaning
>> > > > >> up
>> > > > >> > the code, I can finally look at adding to the test suite.
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > Tom
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> --
>> > > > >> *Lewis*
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > *Lewis*
>> > >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Lewis*
>>
>
>

Reply via email to