Each module has a site package. The documentation in these packages needs to be brought back in to the mix again as well.
On Saturday, April 2, 2016, Tom Barber <tom.bar...@meteorite.bi> wrote: > Alright folks, > > Most peope who have been on the list for a while know we moved from the > most static of static websites to Apache CMS a while ago to allow for more > regular updating and maintenance of the website. > > Lewis then put a bunch of work into creating a template for the CMS website > and we revamped a lot of the content, but the CMS has a bunch of issues > both in the ease of developing a website and also in maintenance so the > Infra team are retiring it. > > My personal opinion(having done some of this in my day job, and discussed > similar on some other ASF projects) is we migrate the website to gitsubpub > and Jekyll. > > This will give us the ability to easily stand up the existing website on > our own laptops, or development servers make changes and deploy them. Also > without the templating system that Apache CMS enforces upon you, its a far > quicker development cycle. > > Of course we could just use standard HTML & Javascript, but part of the > reason I'd like to use Jekyll is the fact users can create content using > Markdown syntax instead of HTML and Javascript. Jekyll is a static blogging > platform, so its designed for frequent updating, and as people may have > noticed I've been blogging OODT stuff on my personal blog because the CMS > is a pain to update. > > Has anyone got an opinion? It feels like we did stage one which was make > the website easier to update, but stage two is to make the process a lot > easier, and standardised. > > Cheers > > Tom > -- *Lewis*