Better than I thought actually: Tests in error: TestLuceneQueryCliAction.testClientTransTrueAndFlatProduct:78 » CmdLineAction ... TestFileManagerCli.testLuceneQuery:350 » Runtime org.apache.oodt.cas.cli.excep...
Tests run: 221, Failures: 1, Errors: 2, Skipped: 0 The failure is actually one Avro. So only 2 failing on lucene 6 in the FM. On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 9:48 PM, Tom Barber <[email protected]> wrote: > Just FYI: > > Doesn't work yet, but I've pushed a lucene branch which is based on 2.0 > and upgrades lucene to 6.1.0. LuceneCatalog in filemanager has been 75% > (guess) converted and tests are half passing. > > On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 8:30 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> ACK >> >> On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Tom Barber <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > Once avro_rpc is stable, I suggest we rename the branch 2.0-dev or >> similar >> > then branch the branch to uprade solr and lucene outside of that scope >> so >> > we don't destroy the semi working avro upgrades ;) >> > >> > On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Tom Barber <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > Coolio! >> > > >> > > On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Chris Mattmann <[email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > >> Yes I was just telling Paul R. the other day we need to do >> > >> this, or we’re DOA. I’ve first hand seen the scalability >> > >> issues with Big Translate and DRAT using the old Lucene >> > >> library. Let’s get it fixed in 2.x. >> > >> >> > >> Cheers, >> > >> Chris >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> On 7/6/16, 8:51 AM, "Tom Barber" <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> > >> >Just throwing this one out there as we're making a bunch of breaking >> > >> >changes in 2.0. >> > >> > >> > >> >Is it worth upgrading Lucene and Solr versions within OODT? >> > >> > >> > >> >My feeling is that they are both pretty old and whilst we're making >> > life >> > >> >hard for everyone we might as well go the whole hog and drag them >> into >> > >> the >> > >> >21st century, but I'm interested in others opinions. >> > >> > >> > >> >Chris you have a much better understand about those things than >> myself. >> > >> > >> > >> >Tom >> > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> *Lewis* >> > >
