yeah there's no reason we can't diff the branch and merge it into 1.0 as well On 9 Jul 2016 00:26, "Chris Mattmann" <[email protected]> wrote:
> awesome!!! > > Please backport to 1.x :) > > > > > On 7/8/16, 3:01 PM, "Tom Barber" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >There you go, running commentary over. The filemanager test suite now > >passes on Lucene 6, I'll fix up the rest next week. > > > >Tom > > > >On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 10:31 PM, Tom Barber <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> Better than I thought actually: > >> > >> Tests in error: > >> TestLuceneQueryCliAction.testClientTransTrueAndFlatProduct:78 » > >> CmdLineAction ... > >> TestFileManagerCli.testLuceneQuery:350 » Runtime > >> org.apache.oodt.cas.cli.excep... > >> > >> Tests run: 221, Failures: 1, Errors: 2, Skipped: 0 > >> > >> The failure is actually one Avro. So only 2 failing on lucene 6 in the > FM. > >> > >> On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 9:48 PM, Tom Barber <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Just FYI: > >>> > >>> Doesn't work yet, but I've pushed a lucene branch which is based on 2.0 > >>> and upgrades lucene to 6.1.0. LuceneCatalog in filemanager has been 75% > >>> (guess) converted and tests are half passing. > >>> > >>> On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 8:30 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney < > >>> [email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> ACK > >>>> > >>>> On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Tom Barber <[email protected]> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > Once avro_rpc is stable, I suggest we rename the branch 2.0-dev or > >>>> similar > >>>> > then branch the branch to uprade solr and lucene outside of that > scope > >>>> so > >>>> > we don't destroy the semi working avro upgrades ;) > >>>> > > >>>> > On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Tom Barber <[email protected] > > > >>>> > wrote: > >>>> > > >>>> > > Coolio! > >>>> > > > >>>> > > On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Chris Mattmann < > [email protected]> > >>>> > > wrote: > >>>> > > > >>>> > >> Yes I was just telling Paul R. the other day we need to do > >>>> > >> this, or we’re DOA. I’ve first hand seen the scalability > >>>> > >> issues with Big Translate and DRAT using the old Lucene > >>>> > >> library. Let’s get it fixed in 2.x. > >>>> > >> > >>>> > >> Cheers, > >>>> > >> Chris > >>>> > >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> > >> On 7/6/16, 8:51 AM, "Tom Barber" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>> > >> > >>>> > >> >Just throwing this one out there as we're making a bunch of > >>>> breaking > >>>> > >> >changes in 2.0. > >>>> > >> > > >>>> > >> >Is it worth upgrading Lucene and Solr versions within OODT? > >>>> > >> > > >>>> > >> >My feeling is that they are both pretty old and whilst we're > making > >>>> > life > >>>> > >> >hard for everyone we might as well go the whole hog and drag > them > >>>> into > >>>> > >> the > >>>> > >> >21st century, but I'm interested in others opinions. > >>>> > >> > > >>>> > >> >Chris you have a much better understand about those things than > >>>> myself. > >>>> > >> > > >>>> > >> >Tom > >>>> > >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> > > > >>>> > > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> *Lewis* > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >
