Hi All,

This is an old thread where we discussed the plan for next releases. In
summary, following was the plan:

2.0 – first release where we remove all the Xml-RPC and we change nothing
else. Avro is the default, and only
comm option – though interface exists for anyone that wants to roll their
own. We change nothing else*

2.1 – first release with newer JDK support (everyone is asking for this,
and it screws up people like me with
new Macs, or computers and newer JDKs by default). We also begin cleaning
up dependencies and removing
old ones, and pointing at new stuff.

2.2 – OpsUi React with GSoC 2019 output.

2.3 – We integrate, test and demo the Docker builds. We also test and fully
bake the ZK deployments and
scaled up Docker.

Any changes/suggestions to the above plan?
What if we release the OpsUI ahead of others?

Thanks,
Imesha

On Sun, 6 Oct 2019 at 06:20, Tom Barber <t...@spicule.co.uk> wrote:

> Sounds good to me. Should also increase the release cadence as well.
>
>
> On 5 October 2019 at 09:06:35, Chris Mattmann (mattm...@apache.org) wrote:
>
> Here is my suggested Roadmap here:
>
>
>
> 2.0 – first release where we remove all the Xml-RPC and we change nothing
> else. Avro is the default, and only
> comm option – though interface exists for anyone that wants to roll their
> own. We change nothing else*
>
>
>
> 2.1 – first release with newer JDK support (everyone is asking for this,
> and it screws up people like me with
> new Macs, or computers and newer JDKs by default). We also begin cleaning
> up dependencies and removing
> old ones, and pointing at new stuff.
>
>
>
> 2.2 – OpsUi React with Breno’s stuff.
>
>
>
> 2.3 – We integrate, test and demo the Docker builds. We also test and fully
> bake the ZK deployments and
> scaled up Docker.
>
>
>
> 2.4+ … who knows
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Tom Barber <t...@spicule.co.uk>
> Reply-To: <dev@oodt.apache.org>
> Date: Saturday, October 5, 2019 at 3:31 AM
> To: <dev@oodt.apache.org>, Imesha Sudasingha <ime...@apache.org>
> Subject: Re: OODT 2.0 planning
>
>
>
> On 5 October 2019 at 11:25:41, Imesha Sudasingha (ime...@apache.org)
> wrote:
>
>
>
> I think there was a plan to
>
> remove XML rpc support completely and use avro only in 2.0.
>
>
>
>
>
> That is true. XMLRPC needs to die.
>
>
>
> Not sure about Knative, but certainly a Kubernetes operator would be
>
> something interesting to look at if we could.
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
>
>
> Spicule Limited is registered in England & Wales. Company Number:
>
> 09954122. Registered office: First Floor, Telecom House, 125-135 Preston
>
> Road, Brighton, England, BN1 6AF. VAT No. 251478891.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> All engagements
>
> are subject to Spicule Terms and Conditions of Business. This email and its
>
> contents are intended solely for the individual to whom it is addressed and
>
> may contain information that is confidential, privileged or otherwise
>
> protected from disclosure, distributing or copying. Any views or opinions
>
> presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not
>
> necessarily represent those of Spicule Limited. The company accepts no
>
> liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. If
>
> you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by
>
> reply email before deleting it from your system. Service of legal notice
>
> cannot be effected on Spicule Limited by email.
>
> --
>
>
> Spicule Limited is registered in England & Wales. Company Number:
> 09954122. Registered office: First Floor, Telecom House, 125-135 Preston
> Road, Brighton, England, BN1 6AF. VAT No. 251478891.
>
>
>
>
> All engagements
> are subject to Spicule Terms and Conditions of Business. This email and
> its
> contents are intended solely for the individual to whom it is addressed
> and
> may contain information that is confidential, privileged or otherwise
> protected from disclosure, distributing or copying. Any views or opinions
> presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not
> necessarily represent those of Spicule Limited. The company accepts no
> liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. If
> you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by
> reply email before deleting it from your system. Service of legal notice
> cannot be effected on Spicule Limited by email.
>

Reply via email to