Hi All, As per our offline conversation, I started testing with JDK11 migration. As the first step just updated some of the project dependencies and fixed some unit tests. Please have a look at the PR [1]. There are few more critical dependency updates like Solr and I hope to do it in the next few days.
[1] https://github.com/apache/oodt/pull/118 Thanks and regards, Gimhana On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 at 12:32, Imesha Sudasingha <ime...@apache.org> wrote: > Seems like it was due to JDK 11. Got through using JDK 8. > > On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 at 12:28, Imesha Sudasingha <ime...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Hi Gimhana, > > > > Thanks for the details. As per our offline conversation, did you manage > to > > get the JDK 11 testing ongoing? > > Because I tried to build this on JDK 11 today and it failed with: > > > > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal > > org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin:2.10.3:javadoc > > (attach-javadocs) on project oodt-core: Execution attach-javadocs of goal > > org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin:2.10.3:javadoc failed: An > API > > incompatibility was encountered while executing > > org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin:2.10.3:javadoc: > > java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError: null > > [ERROR] ----------------------------------------------------- > > [ERROR] realm = > > plugin>org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin:2.10.3 > > [ERROR] strategy = > > org.codehaus.plexus.classworlds.strategy.SelfFirstStrategy > > [ERROR] urls[0] = > > > file:/home/imesha/.m2/repository/org/apache/maven/plugins/maven-javadoc-plugin/2.10.3/maven-javadoc-plugin-2.10.3.jar > > > > Not sure if this was entirely due to JDK 11. > > > > Imesha > > > > On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 at 07:59, Gimhana Nadeeshan < > > gimhanadesilva...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote: > > > >> Hi all, > >> > >> 2. About JDK 11 support, does anybody have any idea on how we can test > >> that > >> > or what issues do we have when running with JDK 11? I remember Lewis > >> trying > >> > to run OODT with JDK 10 sometime back [3] [4] > >> > > >> > >> As we discussed offline, here I'll put my suggestion regarding OpenJDK > 11 > >> migration. > >> > >> When migrating basically what we have to have to do is > >> > >> - Update all dependencies to the latest versions. > >> - Compile the project and resolve all issues related to unofficial > >> access, split packages and deprecated/removed Java EE modules. > >> > >> We use the official Oracle JDK 11 migration guide[1] as a head start. > >> However, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to update all the > >> dependencies without breaking stuff. Have to try and see! > >> > >> [1] > https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/11/migrate/migration-guide.pdf > >> > >> Thanks and Regards, > >> Gimhana > >> > >> On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 at 13:32, Imesha Sudasingha <ime...@apache.org> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Great! We have 2 action items then: > >> > > >> > 1. Making Avro RPC the default. We once did this for the 1.9 release > and > >> > later reverted due to 1.x backward compatibility issues [1]. > Therefore, > >> > this task can reuse some commits we had there (simply revert [2]). > >> > > >> > 2. About JDK 11 support, does anybody have any idea on how we can test > >> that > >> > or what issues do we have when running with JDK 11? I remember Lewis > >> trying > >> > to run OODT with JDK 10 sometime back [3] [4] > >> > > >> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OODT-1031 > >> > [2] https://github.com/apache/oodt/pull/116 > >> > [3] https://github.com/apache/oodt/pull/71 > >> > [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OODT-990 > >> > > >> > > >> > On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 at 22:20, Tom Barber <t...@spicule.co.uk> wrote: > >> > > >> > > I've officially marked all my email as read, so thats 3000 emails > gone > >> > > forever... on the plus side, I should have some time now. I've got a > >> > couple > >> > > of projects I need to get off my plate so I shall setup my new > laptop > >> > next > >> > > week and sort them out, then I'll get this code base stood back up > and > >> > > figure out the best place to start. > >> > > > >> > > Tom > >> > > > >> > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 4:22 PM Chris Mattmann <mattm...@apache.org > > > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > +1 from me Imesha! > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > From: Imesha Sudasingha <ime...@apache.org> > >> > > > Reply-To: <dev@oodt.apache.org> > >> > > > Date: Wednesday, November 11, 2020 at 7:49 AM > >> > > > To: dev <dev@oodt.apache.org> > >> > > > Subject: Re: OODT 2.0 planning > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > Hi All, > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > This is my suggestion, what if we include both Avro default > support > >> and > >> > > JDK > >> > > > > >> > > > 11 support for OODT 2.0 as JDK 11 support seems to be critical as > >> well. > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > What do you think? > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > Cheers, > >> > > > > >> > > > Imesha > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > < > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > Virus-free. > >> > > > > >> > > > www.avast.com > >> > > > > >> > > > < > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 at 14:42, Imesha Sudasingha <ime...@apache.org > > > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > Hi Sean, > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > Regarding docker images, we haven't decided where to push them > yet. > >> > > Yasith > >> > > > > >> > > > was the person who contributed to them for his GSoC. > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > Hi Yasith, > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > Your help is much appreciated and we will definitely need your > help > >> > > there. > >> > > > > >> > > > Keep in touch with the mails in this list. > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > Thanks, > >> > > > > >> > > > Imesha > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > On Tue, 3 Nov 2020 at 22:55, Jayawardana, Yasith < > yas...@cs.odu.edu > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > > wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > Hello all, > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > I can make some time to help with the 2.3 release as well. > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > Best Regards, > >> > > > > >> > > > Yasith > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > On Nov 3, 2020, at 10:23 AM, Sean Kelly <ke...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> 2.0 – first release where we remove all the Xml-RPC and we > change > >> > > > > >> > > > nothing > >> > > > > >> > > > >> else. Avro is the default, and only > >> > > > > >> > > > >> comm option – though interface exists for anyone that wants to > >> roll > >> > > > > >> > > > their > >> > > > > >> > > > >> own. We change nothing else* > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > Sounds fine by me. XML-RPC was "fun while it lasted". > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > > > >> 2.1 – first release with newer JDK support (everyone is asking > >> for > >> > > > > >> > > > this, > >> > > > > >> > > > >> and it screws up people like me with > >> > > > > >> > > > >> new Macs, or computers and newer JDKs by default). We also > begin > >> > > > > >> > > > cleaning > >> > > > > >> > > > >> up dependencies and removing > >> > > > > >> > > > >> old ones, and pointing at new stuff. > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > Oh my glob yes, yes, yes! > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > > > >> 2.2 – OpsUi React with GSoC 2019 output. > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > I can't comment on 2.2 since I've never used it. > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > > > >> 2.3 – We integrate, test and demo the Docker builds. We also > test > >> > and > >> > > > > >> > > > fully > >> > > > > >> > > > >> bake the ZK deployments and > >> > > > > >> > > > >> scaled up Docker. > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > Are these the images owned by "oodthub" on hub.docker.com? > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > Take care, > >> > > > > >> > > > > -SK > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > -- > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > Spicule Limited is registered in England & Wales. Company Number: > >> > > 09954122. Registered office: First Floor, Telecom House, 125-135 > >> Preston > >> > > Road, Brighton, England, BN1 6AF. VAT No. 251478891. > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > All engagements > >> > > are subject to Spicule Terms and Conditions of Business. This email > >> and > >> > > its > >> > > contents are intended solely for the individual to whom it is > >> addressed > >> > > and > >> > > may contain information that is confidential, privileged or > otherwise > >> > > protected from disclosure, distributing or copying. Any views or > >> opinions > >> > > presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not > >> > > necessarily represent those of Spicule Limited. The company accepts > no > >> > > liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this > >> email. > >> > If > >> > > you have received this message in error, please notify us > immediately > >> by > >> > > reply email before deleting it from your system. Service of legal > >> notice > >> > > cannot be effected on Spicule Limited by email. > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> * <http://www.linkedin.com/in/nadeeshangimhana/>* > >> > >> > >> * <http://www.linkedin.com/in/nadeeshangimhana/>* > >> > > > * <http://www.linkedin.com/in/nadeeshangimhana/>* * <http://www.linkedin.com/in/nadeeshangimhana/>*
