> On March 5, 2013, 8:11 p.m., Mona Chitnis wrote:
> > Ship It!

Hi Mona, thank you for taking a look.

The issue (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1204) is complaining a 
syntax like below does not work.

  <sla:should-end>${ ${SLA_OFFSET} * MINUTES}</sla:should-end>

This does not work indeed, since it is not how commons.el package works.

Instead, a syntax below works as is in this patch review.

  <sla:should-end>${ SLA_OFFSET * MINUTES}</sla:should-end>

The patch is to modify a test to illustrate (but again Nothing to be fixed)

Question to your "Ship It!"; did you mean to still apply the patch and show as 
example? and close the issue as the use case is invalid?


- jun


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9282/#review17422
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Feb. 4, 2013, 6:47 a.m., jun aoki wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/9282/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 4, 2013, 6:47 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for oozie.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> <sla:should-end>${ ${SLA_OFFSET} * MINUTES}</sla:should-end>
> 
> is not working since the entire text value is passed to commons.el evaluator.
> 
> <sla:should-end>${ SLA_OFFSET * MINUTES}</sla:should-end>
> 
> works. 
> 
> I also have a review request to illustrate what I mean with a tweaked test.
> I believe the user case is invalid and no code change is required.
> Let me know if it makes sense.
> 
> 
> This addresses bug OOZIE-1204.
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1204
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/oozie/trunk/core/src/test/java/org/apache/oozie/command/coord/TestCoordSubmitXCommand.java
>  1441877 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9282/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> jun aoki
> 
>

Reply via email to