[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14317127#comment-14317127
]
Purshotam Shah commented on OOZIE-2108:
---------------------------------------
{quote}
>From sharelib installation behavior change to OOZIE-1754 to the recent new
>maven build change, we see some of our affected customers absolutely furious
>about the changes.
In most of the cases the changes are unintentional or missing scenarios to take
care of when trying to enhance something and is not done with the intent of
breaking backward compatibility. Cannot avoid something happening like that
occasionally and is a matter of fixing it if found during testing or enhancing
our test suites to cover those cases. Usually when someone is trying to change
something that involves backward compatibility or bigger change, I have always
seen folks asking others for review or confirmation before going ahead with it.
{quote}
Agree with Rohini, nobody is intended to break backward compatibility. It
happens because some time we don't realize that it's breaking backward
compatibility.
One solution is do code review by multiple people and report it if it's
breaking backward compatibility like we recently did for
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2107.
> bulk kill, suspend, resume jobs using existing filter, offset, len, and
> jobtype params
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OOZIE-2108
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2108
> Project: Oozie
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Bowen Zhang
> Assignee: Bowen Zhang
> Attachments: oozie-2108.patch
>
>
> Currently, there is no bulk write operations in "jobs" API. We would like to
> first introduce a bulk kill operation that kills all jobs which satisfy the
> filter. The desired usage will be {noformat}oozie jobs -oozie
> http://localhost:11000/oozie -kill -filter name=something{noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
