[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3056?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16411305#comment-16411305
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on OOZIE-3056:
----------------------------------

PreCommit-OOZIE-Build started


> Implement new mechanism to specify ShareLibs for workflow actions
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OOZIE-3056
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3056
>             Project: Oozie
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: core
>    Affects Versions: 5.0.0
>            Reporter: Attila Sasvari
>            Assignee: Peter Cseh
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 5.0.0
>
>         Attachments: OOZIE-3056.001.patch, OOZIE-3056.002.patch, 
> OOZIE-3056.003.patch, OOZIE-3056.004.patch, OOZIE-3056.005.patch
>
>
> OOZIE-2687 introduces the {{launcher}} element for workflows:
> {code}
> <launcher>
>             <memory>1024</memory>
>             <vcores>1</vcores>
>             <java-opts>-Dsome.property=true -XX:+RandomJVMSwitch</java-opts>
>             <env>key=value</env>
>             <queue>root.oozie</queue>
>             <sharelib>spark,hive</sharelib>
>         </launcher>
> {code}
> The purpose of this ticket is to discuss and implement new mechanism for 
> handling ShareLib. 
> {{addActionShareLib}} in {{JavaActionExecutor}} should adjusted. Regarding 
> "precedence order":
> if global and an action level {{launcher}} and {{configuration}} (e.g. 
> {{oozie.action.sharelib.for.#ACTIONTYPE#}}) tries to override the sharelib 
> the following should apply:
> {quote} 
> config properties defined in an action's <configuration> have priority over 
> an action's <job-xml>, which has priority over the global section's 
> <configuration> and <job-xml>, which has priority over the action defaults in 
> oozie-site, and so on.
> {quote}
> Here we have multiple choices how to handle sharelib:
> - Alternative 1: override sharelib in a way that is consistent with current 
> way of handling Oozie configuration settings.
> - Alternative 2: make sharelib additive
> -- For example, if there is a global {{launcher}} with {{sharelib}} element 
> in a workflow that includes multiple ShareLibs (e.g. A,B), and  
> {{oozie.action.sharelib.for.#ACTIONTYPE#}} is also specified for an action's 
> configuration (e.g. C,D), then we take the union of the specified entities 
> (A,B,C,D would be included). 
> -- It's inconsistent with everything else



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to