[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16802979#comment-16802979
]
Andras Salamon commented on OOZIE-3443:
---------------------------------------
[~matijhs] Maybe it would be better to only define the version number in the
root pom and refer to it explicitly it the sharelibs. What do you think? It
would make it more clear that we don't really want to use joda directly.
> Migrate from joda time to java.time
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: OOZIE-3443
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3443
> Project: Oozie
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: trunk
> Reporter: Andras Salamon
> Assignee: Mate Juhasz
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: OOZIE-3443-V1.patch, OOZIE-3443-V2.patch,
> OOZIE-3443-V3.patch
>
>
> From Java SE 8 onwards, users are asked to migrate to from [joda
> time|https://www.joda.org/joda-time/] to java.time (JSR-310).
> It seems to me, that we only use it directly in one place:
> [TestWorkflowActionRetryInfoXCommand.java|https://github.com/apache/oozie/blob/master/core/src/test/java/org/apache/oozie/command/wf/TestWorkflowActionRetryInfoXCommand.java]
> so it would be not too difficult to migrate.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
