Hi guys, While I completely understand the reasoning for the discussion to retire OpenAXZ, and to be completely honest I was surprised it took this long), it would be a real shame to see it just fade away into oblivion.
That said, what does happen when a project never makes it to a TLP? Does it have a chance to be resuscitated later if it is deemed worthwhile and has more interest? Does the license revert back to AT&T? XACML is a complicated spec and I can¹t say that I fully understand it yet, but I think it solves a real problem (I just regret not having the time personally to help push it along). Regards, Carlos On 2/8/16, 6:34 AM, "Emmanuel Lécharny" <[email protected]> wrote: >Le 08/02/16 11:15, Colm O hEigeartaigh a écrit : >> Hi all, >> >> I would like to initiate a discussion on retiring Openaz: >> >> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/retirement >> >> The last commit was by myself on November the 2nd (over 2 months ago). >>From >> my POV there is little to no activity on either the codebase or mailing >> lists. There has been no release since the project entered incubation, >>and >> no prospect whatsoever of graduating as a TLP as things stand. >> >> Colm. >> >As much as I think OpenAZ is a good fit to The ASF, the lack of activity >proves it as unsuited to the way we work. There is no community behind >the project. > >I agree that it's probably time to thing about a better place for this >project than the ASF. > This e-mail message and any attachments to it are intended only for the named recipients and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not one of the intended recipients, do not duplicate or forward this e-mail message.
