+1
On 7/3/07, Karan Malhi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would say we remove it. We already have a CMP over JPA
implementation, however if you can point out where you are going to
make the change to remove castor jdo, then i can document it so that
if need be, we can plug it in later.
On 6/26/07, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jun 26, 2007, at 12:09 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>
> > Does anyone mind if I drop castor jdo for CMP in OpenEJB 3.0? I
> > think this will allow for a nice simplification of the CMP over JPA
> > code, and will further reduce our dependencies. Since castor
> > doesn't support EJB-QL and managed relationships, it wasn't tested
> > in during the JEE certification work so, I doubt it works properly
> > anymore.
> >
> > If the castor team complete a JPA implementation, we will be able
> > to support it via our existing CMP over JPA engine.
>
> I think that's the most important question now that I give it some
> thought, i.e. who is willing to support it. I certainly don't want
> to. Maybe we retire it but leave the CMP over JPA code alone (i.e.
> be ready to put it back) for a release or two to see if people
> complain about it not being there.
>
> -David
>
>
>
--
Karan Singh Malhi
