I looked at the HOWL project at ObjectWeb and seems that it is an old
project and no further development is made, so why we use it ?

On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 8:07 PM, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After thinking about this more, I don't think that we should turn on
>  recovery at this point in the 3.0 release cycle.  I think it is good
>  turning it on in trunk (3.1) so we can get lots of testing in before
>  releasing it.
>
>  One other thing, the tx logs should be in a directory in the data
>  directory.  I'm not sure if that is happening now but the property
>  should be something like data/txlog.
>
>  -dain
>
>
>
>  On Mar 16, 2008, at 10:03 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>
>  > On Mar 16, 2008, at 9:33 AM, David Jencks wrote:
>  >
>  >>
>  >> On Mar 15, 2008, at 2:37 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>  >>
>  >>>
>  >>> On Mar 15, 2008, at 12:06 AM, David Jencks wrote:
>  >>>
>  >>>> While not ideal, I think using a working although slower
>  >>>> transport is a reasonable compromise to a faster, broken
>  >>>> transport until we can get a fixed activemq out.
>  >>>
>  >>> We definitely need the vm transport for the embedded testing
>  >>> scenarios and we don't have tx recovery yet, so this is something
>  >>> we probably don't want enable by default.  We can wrap the
>  >>> wrapping with the "duct tape" flag like so:
>  >>>
>  >>>  if (System.getProperty("duct tape") != null) {
>  >>>      xaResource = new WrapperNamedXAResource(xaResource,
>  >>> container.getContainerID().toString());
>  >>>  }
>  >>>  EndpointHandler endpointHandler = new EndpointHandler(container,
>  >>> deploymentInfo, instanceFactory, xaResource);
>  >>>
>  >>> If you have time to make the change and rollback the service-
>  >>> jar.xml settings, that'd be great, otherwise I'll get to it before
>  >>> we release.
>  >>
>  >> You should probably check my work :-) but after some work I think
>  >> the current status is:
>  >>
>  >> - recovery works if howl log configured in tm configuration
>  >> - there's a flag TxRecovery for MDB container and the DBCP pools
>  >> that turns on the NamedXAResource wrapping
>  >> - recovery and wrapping is turned on for standalone and tomcat, and
>  >> these use the amq tcp transport
>  >> - recovery and wrapping is turned off for embedded and it uses vm
>  >> transport
>  >>
>  >> The tests break if you turn on recovery and wrapping in embedded
>  >> because the howl log locks its log files and does not unlock them.
>  >> Without a "stop" lifecycle call I don't know how the howl log can
>  >> determine its time for a clean shutdown.
>  >
>  > How about a finalizer (assuming we have a point where the log is
>  > GCed)?  We could subclass the howl log service in OpenEJB and add
>  > the finalizer.
>  >
>  > -dain
>
>



-- 
Thanks
- Mohammad Nour

Reply via email to