On Aug 22, 2010, at 4:19 PM, Karan Malhi wrote: > I want to help running the tck with openejb. How should I proceed with it, > any help on this would be great.
You mean like an OpenEJB tck setup? -David > On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 7:44 PM, David Jencks <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Jon, >> So far this change seems to be working fine. >> >> Looking forward to your eyes on the tck:-) >> >> thanks >> david jencks >> >> On Aug 5, 2010, at 4:39 PM, Jonathan Gallimore wrote: >> >>> Hi David, >>> >>> I did suspect there would an issue with which classloader the proxy got >>> attached to at some point when I wrote this :-). I think your change is >>> fine, I can't see any problems with it. Does fix the TCK now? If not, I'm >>> happy to try and help out more. The necessary paperwork is in so I should >> be >>> able to start having a go with the TCK. >>> >>> Jon >>> >>> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 6:39 AM, David Jencks <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>>> It would be really really great to have more eyes on the tck. >>>> >>>> This particular problem seems to be due to an interaction between >> geronimo >>>> and openejb. In geronimo the classloader that the proxy is attached to >> is a >>>> wrapper for the osgi bundle and doesn't actually load any classes >> itself. >>>> So once the proxy is attached to that classloader it becomes completely >>>> inaccessible. >>>> >>>> I'm changing the code involved to use the original proxied class's >>>> classloader and protection domain. So far I don't see any problems in >>>> geronimo or openejb. >>>> >>>> Class<?> cls = (Class<?>) unsafe.defineClass(proxyName, >>>> proxyBytes, 0, proxyBytes.length, clsToProxy.getClassLoader(), >>>> clsToProxy.getProtectionDomain()); >>>> >>>> I've opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1321 to >> provide >>>> a hook for any problems this may cause. I'd really appreciate some >> review >>>> and informed criticism. >>>> >>>> many thanks >>>> david jencks >>>> >>>> On Aug 4, 2010, at 12:22 PM, David Blevins wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thinking it might be good to get more of us setup in the TCK. >> Currently, >>>> Geronimo is the only one with a TCK setup, but it is better than >> nothing. >>>>> >>>>> With all the EJB 3.1 work there of course comes a ton of TCK work >> related >>>> to getting that functionality to be spec compliant in the pass/fail >> sense. >>>> As Geronimo is the only one with a TCK setup it translates to Geronimo >>>> getting stuck having to finish the EJB 3.1 development work. Seems to >> make >>>> the most sense to get the people doing EJB 3.1 feature involved in >> ensuring >>>> it passes the TCK. >>>>> >>>>> Any committer can request Java EE 6 TCK access via singing faxing or >>>> emailing ([email protected]) this NDA: >>>>> >>>>> http://www.apache.org/jcp/ApacheNDA.pdf >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Anyway, here is the issue that prompted me to send this note. Related >> to >>>> @LocalBean support. David J. poking at it currently, but any help is >>>> welcome. There will definitely be many more like this. Having the most >>>> people with access to the TCK as possible is probably a very good thing. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Caused by: java.lang.LinkageError: loader (instance of >>>> org/apache/xbean/osgi/bundle/util/BundleClassLoader): attempted >> duplicate >>>> class definition for name: "com/moon/sometest/SomeBean$LocalBeanProxy" >>>>> at sun.misc.Unsafe.defineClass(Native Method) >>>>> at >>>> >> org.apache.openejb.util.proxy.LocalBeanProxyGeneratorImpl.createProxy(LocalBeanProxyGeneratorImpl.java:65) >>>>> at >>>> >> org.apache.openejb.util.proxy.LocalBeanProxyGeneratorImpl.createProxy(LocalBeanProxyGeneratorImpl.java:48) >>>>> at >>>> >> org.apache.openejb.util.proxy.LocalBeanProxyFactory.newProxyInstance(LocalBeanProxyFactory.java:27) >>>>> at >>>> >> org.apache.openejb.core.ivm.EjbHomeProxyHandler.createProxy(EjbHomeProxyHandler.java:139) >>>>> at >>>> >> org.apache.openejb.core.ivm.EjbHomeProxyHandler.create(EjbHomeProxyHandler.java:286) >>>>> at >>>> >> org.apache.openejb.core.ivm.EjbHomeProxyHandler._invoke(EjbHomeProxyHandler.java:169) >>>>> at >>>> >> org.apache.openejb.core.ivm.BaseEjbProxyHandler.invoke(BaseEjbProxyHandler.java:282) >>>>> at $Proxy52.create(Unknown Source) >>>>> at >>>> >> org.apache.openejb.core.ivm.naming.BusinessLocalBeanReference.getObject(BusinessLocalBeanReference.java:34) >>>>> at >>>> >> org.apache.openejb.core.ivm.naming.Reference.getContent(Reference.java:40) >>>>> at >>>> org.apache.xbean.naming.context.ContextUtil.resolve(ContextUtil.java:61) >>>>> at >>>> >> org.apache.xbean.naming.context.AbstractContext.lookup(AbstractContext.java:116) >>>>> at >>>> >> org.apache.xbean.naming.context.AbstractContext.lookup(AbstractContext.java:605) >>>>> at >>>> >> org.apache.geronimo.openejb.DeepBindableContext$ContextWrapper.lookup(DeepBindableContext.java:97) >>>>> at >>>> >> org.apache.openejb.core.ivm.naming.IntraVmJndiReference.getObject(IntraVmJndiReference.java:39) >>>>> at >>>> >> org.apache.openejb.core.ivm.naming.Reference.getContent(Reference.java:40) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -David >>>>> >>>> >>>> >> >> > > > -- > Karan Singh Malhi
