Yes

On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 7:23 PM, David Blevins <[email protected]>wrote:

>
> On Aug 22, 2010, at 4:19 PM, Karan Malhi wrote:
>
> > I want to help running the tck with openejb. How should I proceed with
> it,
> > any help on this would be great.
>
> You mean like an OpenEJB tck setup?
>
>
> -David
>
>
> > On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 7:44 PM, David Jencks <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Jon,
> >> So far this change seems to be working fine.
> >>
> >> Looking forward to your eyes on the tck:-)
> >>
> >> thanks
> >> david jencks
> >>
> >> On Aug 5, 2010, at 4:39 PM, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi David,
> >>>
> >>> I did suspect there would an issue with which classloader the proxy got
> >>> attached to at some point when I wrote this :-). I think your change is
> >>> fine, I can't see any problems with it. Does fix the TCK now? If not,
> I'm
> >>> happy to try and help out more. The necessary paperwork is in so I
> should
> >> be
> >>> able to start having a go with the TCK.
> >>>
> >>> Jon
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 6:39 AM, David Jencks <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> It would be really really great to have more eyes on the tck.
> >>>>
> >>>> This particular problem seems to be due to an interaction between
> >> geronimo
> >>>> and openejb.  In geronimo the classloader that the proxy is attached
> to
> >> is a
> >>>> wrapper for the osgi bundle and doesn't actually load any classes
> >> itself.
> >>>> So once the proxy is attached to that classloader it becomes
> completely
> >>>> inaccessible.
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm changing the code involved to use the original proxied class's
> >>>> classloader and protection domain.  So far I don't see any problems in
> >>>> geronimo or openejb.
> >>>>
> >>>>          Class<?> cls = (Class<?>) unsafe.defineClass(proxyName,
> >>>> proxyBytes, 0, proxyBytes.length, clsToProxy.getClassLoader(),
> >>>> clsToProxy.getProtectionDomain());
> >>>>
> >>>> I've opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1321 to
> >> provide
> >>>> a hook for any problems this may cause.  I'd really appreciate some
> >> review
> >>>> and informed criticism.
> >>>>
> >>>> many thanks
> >>>> david jencks
> >>>>
> >>>> On Aug 4, 2010, at 12:22 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Thinking it might be good to get more of us setup in the TCK.
> >> Currently,
> >>>> Geronimo is the only one with a TCK setup, but it is better than
> >> nothing.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> With all the EJB 3.1 work there of course comes a ton of TCK work
> >> related
> >>>> to getting that functionality to be spec compliant in the pass/fail
> >> sense.
> >>>> As Geronimo is the only one with a TCK setup it translates to Geronimo
> >>>> getting stuck having to finish the EJB 3.1 development work.  Seems to
> >> make
> >>>> the most sense to get the people doing EJB 3.1 feature involved in
> >> ensuring
> >>>> it passes the TCK.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Any committer can request Java EE 6 TCK access via singing faxing or
> >>>> emailing ([email protected]) this NDA:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://www.apache.org/jcp/ApacheNDA.pdf
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Anyway, here is the issue that prompted me to send this note.
>  Related
> >> to
> >>>> @LocalBean support.  David J. poking at it currently, but any help is
> >>>> welcome.  There will definitely be many more like this.  Having the
> most
> >>>> people with access to the TCK as possible is probably a very good
> thing.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Caused by: java.lang.LinkageError: loader (instance of
> >>>> org/apache/xbean/osgi/bundle/util/BundleClassLoader): attempted
> >> duplicate
> >>>> class definition for name: "com/moon/sometest/SomeBean$LocalBeanProxy"
> >>>>>     at sun.misc.Unsafe.defineClass(Native Method)
> >>>>>     at
> >>>>
> >>
> org.apache.openejb.util.proxy.LocalBeanProxyGeneratorImpl.createProxy(LocalBeanProxyGeneratorImpl.java:65)
> >>>>>     at
> >>>>
> >>
> org.apache.openejb.util.proxy.LocalBeanProxyGeneratorImpl.createProxy(LocalBeanProxyGeneratorImpl.java:48)
> >>>>>     at
> >>>>
> >>
> org.apache.openejb.util.proxy.LocalBeanProxyFactory.newProxyInstance(LocalBeanProxyFactory.java:27)
> >>>>>     at
> >>>>
> >>
> org.apache.openejb.core.ivm.EjbHomeProxyHandler.createProxy(EjbHomeProxyHandler.java:139)
> >>>>>     at
> >>>>
> >>
> org.apache.openejb.core.ivm.EjbHomeProxyHandler.create(EjbHomeProxyHandler.java:286)
> >>>>>     at
> >>>>
> >>
> org.apache.openejb.core.ivm.EjbHomeProxyHandler._invoke(EjbHomeProxyHandler.java:169)
> >>>>>     at
> >>>>
> >>
> org.apache.openejb.core.ivm.BaseEjbProxyHandler.invoke(BaseEjbProxyHandler.java:282)
> >>>>>     at $Proxy52.create(Unknown Source)
> >>>>>     at
> >>>>
> >>
> org.apache.openejb.core.ivm.naming.BusinessLocalBeanReference.getObject(BusinessLocalBeanReference.java:34)
> >>>>>     at
> >>>>
> >>
> org.apache.openejb.core.ivm.naming.Reference.getContent(Reference.java:40)
> >>>>>     at
> >>>>
> org.apache.xbean.naming.context.ContextUtil.resolve(ContextUtil.java:61)
> >>>>>     at
> >>>>
> >>
> org.apache.xbean.naming.context.AbstractContext.lookup(AbstractContext.java:116)
> >>>>>     at
> >>>>
> >>
> org.apache.xbean.naming.context.AbstractContext.lookup(AbstractContext.java:605)
> >>>>>     at
> >>>>
> >>
> org.apache.geronimo.openejb.DeepBindableContext$ContextWrapper.lookup(DeepBindableContext.java:97)
> >>>>>     at
> >>>>
> >>
> org.apache.openejb.core.ivm.naming.IntraVmJndiReference.getObject(IntraVmJndiReference.java:39)
> >>>>>     at
> >>>>
> >>
> org.apache.openejb.core.ivm.naming.Reference.getContent(Reference.java:40)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -David
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Karan Singh Malhi
>
>


-- 
Karan Singh Malhi

Reply via email to