I personally think a new release is the most important thing. More important than a new config, more important than OWB changes.
We could easily branch from the last green build and last green and get started finalizing things. -David On Sep 12, 2012, at 1:59 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > since we just got back buildbot and OWB release is coming i think we should > wait them > > wdyt? > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* > *Twitter: @rmannibucau* > *Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com* > > > > > 2012/9/9 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > >> About the conf can we say we valid properties + resources (then other tag >> are not officially supported)? >> Le 9 sept. 2012 20:53, "David Blevins" <david.blev...@gmail.com> a écrit : >> >> A release would be excellent. >>> >>> On Sep 8, 2012, at 10:28 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> We should try to push a rc asap (next week?) >>>> >>>> Here what i want to hack on next week before a rc: >>>> 1) tomcat version update >>> >>> Excellent >>> >>>> 2) mail session property handling (kind of cosmetic) >>>> 3) little refactoring of new conf handling (just refactor my last >>> commits >>>> about it to be prod ready - was a bit in poc mode) >>>> 4) some sample/module to work with mockito >>>> >>>> Then i would like to work on websockets and cdi but will pby not be in >>>> tomee excepted if needed (need to dig into it) so can wait imo. >>>> >>>> I would like to ship the new owb version (well pby fork it for this rc) >>>> with asm (david ping if you need help) >>>> >>>> Finally id like we finish the file format of our conf (java conf can >>> come >>>> in next rc or release since thats new but xml/prop format needs >>> absolutely >>>> to be here to quickly get feedback before the release) >>> >>> There's still some experimentation and testing I'd like to do with the >>> new config stuff before we call it finished. >>> >>> >>> -David >>> >>>
