i don't want a release with OWB 1.1.5, the finalize issue is too much blocking since you use sthg bringing back a newer version of javassist (hibernate for instance)
btw the OWB release will pby be out before we ended cleaning the branch *Romain Manni-Bucau* *Twitter: @rmannibucau* *Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com* 2012/9/12 David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com> > I personally think a new release is the most important thing. More > important than a new config, more important than OWB changes. > > We could easily branch from the last green build and last green and get > started finalizing things. > > > -David > > On Sep 12, 2012, at 1:59 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > > since we just got back buildbot and OWB release is coming i think we > should > > wait them > > > > wdyt? > > > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* > > *Twitter: @rmannibucau* > > *Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com* > > > > > > > > > > 2012/9/9 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > > > >> About the conf can we say we valid properties + resources (then other > tag > >> are not officially supported)? > >> Le 9 sept. 2012 20:53, "David Blevins" <david.blev...@gmail.com> a > écrit : > >> > >> A release would be excellent. > >>> > >>> On Sep 8, 2012, at 10:28 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> We should try to push a rc asap (next week?) > >>>> > >>>> Here what i want to hack on next week before a rc: > >>>> 1) tomcat version update > >>> > >>> Excellent > >>> > >>>> 2) mail session property handling (kind of cosmetic) > >>>> 3) little refactoring of new conf handling (just refactor my last > >>> commits > >>>> about it to be prod ready - was a bit in poc mode) > >>>> 4) some sample/module to work with mockito > >>>> > >>>> Then i would like to work on websockets and cdi but will pby not be in > >>>> tomee excepted if needed (need to dig into it) so can wait imo. > >>>> > >>>> I would like to ship the new owb version (well pby fork it for this > rc) > >>>> with asm (david ping if you need help) > >>>> > >>>> Finally id like we finish the file format of our conf (java conf can > >>> come > >>>> in next rc or release since thats new but xml/prop format needs > >>> absolutely > >>>> to be here to quickly get feedback before the release) > >>> > >>> There's still some experimentation and testing I'd like to do with the > >>> new config stuff before we call it finished. > >>> > >>> > >>> -David > >>> > >>> > >
