HI! This question seems to be related, or at least in the same vein, as OPENJPA-2628, right? Personally (eeeeerrr, professionally) the branches I care most about are 1.2.4, 2.0.2, 2.1.2, 2.2.1.1, 2.2.3. I agree that all those older version number are starting to make things very bloated.
Thanks, Heath On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 2:23 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò <ilgro...@apache.org> wrote: > On 09/09/2016 10:03, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > >> 2016-09-09 10:02 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>: >> >> I know that IBM is still using the 2.2.something branch. >>> >>> I would keep that version around as well, otherwise I agree with you. >>> >>> >>> I'm happy with that if we get releases out, if not then that's in >> internal >> IBM fork and that's it no? >> > > Hi, > I tend to agree with Romain: let's stick with 2.4.2 and 3.0.0 > > Regards. > > > On Friday, 9 September 2016, 10:00, Romain Manni-Bucau < >> rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I think we should only be concentrated on last stable (2.4.x) and next >>>> one >>>> (3.x). Not seen any release of previous versions for a long time so not >>>> sure there is any interest to keep the branches active there. >>>> >>>> >>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >>>> <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress Blog >>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/ >>>> >>> rmannibucau> | >>> >>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber >>>> <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory >>>> <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> >>>> >>>> >>>> 2016-09-09 9:24 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>: >>>> >>>> The following versions are currently marked as 'open' in JIRA: >>>>> >>>>> 1.0.5 >>>>> 1.1.1 >>>>> 1.2.4 >>>>> >>>>> 1.3.0 >>>>> 2.0.2 >>>>> 2.0.3 >>>>> 2.1.2 >>>>> 2.2.1.1 >>>>> 2.2.3 >>>>> 2.3.1 >>>>> 2.2.x >>>>> 2.4.2 >>>>> 2.4.3 >>>>> 2.4.x2.5.0 >>>>> 3.0.0 >>>>> 3 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> That's pretty confusing for our users. And also nasty when creating a >>>>> bug. >>>>> >>>>> So my proposal is to first collect the information about which >>>>> versions we like to maintain at all? >>>>> >>>>> I personally have interest in >>>>> >>>>> * 3.0.0 >>>>> * 2.4.2 >>>>> * the 2.* version IBM folks are maintaining (should be exactly 1 I >>>>> guess) >>>>> Please add to the list which version you do think we need as well. >>>>> >>>>> What do we do with the .x versions? >>>>> Remove them and move the fix-for to the next maintained version? >>>>> E.g. move 2.2.x tickets to 2.2.3 >>>>> >>>>> Any ideas? >>>>> >>>> > -- > Francesco Chicchiriccò > > Tirasa - Open Source Excellence > http://www.tirasa.net/ > > Involved at The Apache Software Foundation: > member, Syncope PMC chair, Cocoon PMC, Olingo PMC, > CXF Committer, OpenJPA Committer, PonyMail PPMC > http://home.apache.org/~ilgrosso/ > >
