Right, I don't foresee that we'd do a new release anytime soon, if ever. But what do you mean by "ditch the following version"? Here are the branches I see:
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openjpa/branches/ 2.2.x is a branch, not a version as you listed above??? Basically, I'd want to keep branches 1.0.x (version 1.0.5), 1.2.x (version 1.2.4), 2.0.x (version 2.0.2), 2.1.x (version 2.1.2), 2.2.1.x (version 2.2.1.1), and 2.2.x (version 2.2.3). Beyond that, deleting any other branches/versions is fine by me. If it would be easier to chat about this on the phone I'd be glad to call you (I could wrestle Jody into the call as well). Thanks, Heath On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid> wrote: > Hi Heath! > > I know that those versions are still used in production > > But are those versions still all get a 'fixed-in' flag? ^^ > > > I mean do you think that we at ASF will ever do a release for those > versions again? > We will of course keep the branches, but will we really do a release? > > Probably for 2.2.3, but the rest? > > > In any case we could then at least ditch the following versions > > > 1.0.5 > 1.1.1 > 1.3.0 > 2.0.3 > 2.3.1 > 2.2.x > 2.4.3 > 2.4.x > 2.5.0 > 3 > > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > > On Tuesday, 13 September 2016, 17:56, Heath Thomann <jpahe...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > HI! This question seems to be related, or at least in the same vein, > as > > OPENJPA-2628, right? Personally (eeeeerrr, professionally) the branches > I > > care most about are 1.2.4, 2.0.2, 2.1.2, 2.2.1.1, 2.2.3. I agree that > all > > those older version number are starting to make things very bloated. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Heath > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 2:23 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò > > <ilgro...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > >> On 09/09/2016 10:03, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > >> > >>> 2016-09-09 10:02 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg > > <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>: > >>> > >>> I know that IBM is still using the 2.2.something branch. > >>>> > >>>> I would keep that version around as well, otherwise I agree with > > you. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> I'm happy with that if we get releases out, if not then > > that's in > >>> internal > >>> IBM fork and that's it no? > >>> > >> > >> Hi, > >> I tend to agree with Romain: let's stick with 2.4.2 and 3.0.0 > >> > >> Regards. > >> > >> > >> On Friday, 9 September 2016, 10:00, Romain Manni-Bucau < > >>> rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> I think we should only be concentrated on last stable (2.4.x) and > > next > >>>>> one > >>>>> (3.x). Not seen any release of previous versions for a long > > time so not > >>>>> sure there is any interest to keep the branches active there. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau > >>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > >>>>> <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress > > Blog > >>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github > > <https://github.com/ > >>>>> > >>>> rmannibucau> | > >>>> > >>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | > > Tomitriber > >>>>> <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory > >>>>> <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> 2016-09-09 9:24 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg > > <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>: > >>>>> > >>>>> The following versions are currently marked as 'open' > > in JIRA: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> 1.0.5 > >>>>>> 1.1.1 > >>>>>> 1.2.4 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> 1.3.0 > >>>>>> 2.0.2 > >>>>>> 2.0.3 > >>>>>> 2.1.2 > >>>>>> 2.2.1.1 > >>>>>> 2.2.3 > >>>>>> 2.3.1 > >>>>>> 2.2.x > >>>>>> 2.4.2 > >>>>>> 2.4.3 > >>>>>> 2.4.x2.5.0 > >>>>>> 3.0.0 > >>>>>> 3 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> That's pretty confusing for our users. And also nasty > > when creating a > >>>>>> bug. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> So my proposal is to first collect the information about > > which > >>>>>> versions we like to maintain at all? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I personally have interest in > >>>>>> > >>>>>> * 3.0.0 > >>>>>> * 2.4.2 > >>>>>> * the 2.* version IBM folks are maintaining (should be > > exactly 1 I > >>>>>> guess) > >>>>>> Please add to the list which version you do think we need > > as well. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> What do we do with the .x versions? > >>>>>> Remove them and move the fix-for to the next maintained > > version? > >>>>>> E.g. move 2.2.x tickets to 2.2.3 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Any ideas? > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >> -- > >> Francesco Chicchiriccò > >> > >> Tirasa - Open Source Excellence > >> http://www.tirasa.net/ > >> > >> Involved at The Apache Software Foundation: > >> member, Syncope PMC chair, Cocoon PMC, Olingo PMC, > >> CXF Committer, OpenJPA Committer, PonyMail PPMC > >> http://home.apache.org/~ilgrosso/ > >> > >> > > >