Hi

We appreciate the follow up, and the pointer to the JIRA issue. If people
from the TomEE community (or indeed anywhere else!) want to get involved,
what's the best way to do that? Is there a list of things that need to be
implemented/fixed? I'd like to try and help in any way I can. Looking
at OPENJPA-2940 it's a little tricky to see where a good place to start is.

We've previously run the TCK for TomEE and published it under
https://tck.work. Looks like there's an issue with that at the moment, but
would running the TCK and publishing the test results so people know where
to jump in be something that would be useful?

Jon

On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 12:13 PM Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hello Richard,
>
> from mobile (sorry for typos ;)
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2025, 17:59 Richard Zowalla <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > We’re currently discussing the future of OpenJPA within TomEE [1] and
> > would appreciate your thoughts on the EE11 efforts (feel free to jump
> into
> > our list discussion, esp. since Jon raised some questions targeting the
> > OpenJPA community).
> >
> > Nevertheless, I wanted to ask, if you are working on JPA 3.2 at the
> moment?
>
>
> We do have:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2940
>
> And Paulo Cristovão de Araújo Silva Filho commits to the topic
> We will appreciate any help on this :)
>
>
> >
> > Additionally, are there any plans for OpenJPA to implement the new
> Jakarta
> > Data specification or do we need to look for a „home“ in the ASF
> umbrella,
> > if we decide to implement it at the ASF.
> >
> > Gruß
> >
> > Richard
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/o8hydq47hvfhqorooql90hc4kf1rbqtk
>

Reply via email to