Hi Jon,

Paulo updated the ticket with the current progress and open features for divide 
and conquer: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2940

Gruß
Richard

On 2025/10/16 11:44:20 Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
> Hi
> 
> We appreciate the follow up, and the pointer to the JIRA issue. If people
> from the TomEE community (or indeed anywhere else!) want to get involved,
> what's the best way to do that? Is there a list of things that need to be
> implemented/fixed? I'd like to try and help in any way I can. Looking
> at OPENJPA-2940 it's a little tricky to see where a good place to start is.
> 
> We've previously run the TCK for TomEE and published it under
> https://tck.work. Looks like there's an issue with that at the moment, but
> would running the TCK and publishing the test results so people know where
> to jump in be something that would be useful?
> 
> Jon
> 
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 12:13 PM Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> 
> > Hello Richard,
> >
> > from mobile (sorry for typos ;)
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 16, 2025, 17:59 Richard Zowalla <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > We’re currently discussing the future of OpenJPA within TomEE [1] and
> > > would appreciate your thoughts on the EE11 efforts (feel free to jump
> > into
> > > our list discussion, esp. since Jon raised some questions targeting the
> > > OpenJPA community).
> > >
> > > Nevertheless, I wanted to ask, if you are working on JPA 3.2 at the
> > moment?
> >
> >
> > We do have:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2940
> >
> > And Paulo Cristovão de Araújo Silva Filho commits to the topic
> > We will appreciate any help on this :)
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Additionally, are there any plans for OpenJPA to implement the new
> > Jakarta
> > > Data specification or do we need to look for a „home“ in the ASF
> > umbrella,
> > > if we decide to implement it at the ASF.
> > >
> > > Gruß
> > >
> > > Richard
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/o8hydq47hvfhqorooql90hc4kf1rbqtk
> >
> 

Reply via email to